Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40842880›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanotechnology2025

Controlling rate of release of tsetse fly repellent blend by encapsulating in β-cyclodextrin nanoparticles.

Bernadatte M Ratemo, Benson M Wachira, Eric Masika, Margaret M Ng'ang'a, Ahmed Hassanali, Paul O Mireji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bernadatte M RatemoDepartment of Chemistry, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Benson M WachiraDepartment of Chemistry, Pwani University, Kilifi, Kenya.
Eric MasikaDepartment of Chemistry, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Margaret M Ng'ang'aDepartment of Chemistry, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ahmed HassanaliDepartment of Chemistry, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Paul O MirejiBiotechnology Research Institute, Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization, Kikuyu, Kenya.

Funding

Control of Tsetse Fly Transmitted Diseases in KenyaU01AI115648 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI AKSOY, SERAP · 2015 to 2019
$3.6M
Support for Vector Biology Training for Sustainable Control of Vector Borne diseases in East AfricaD43TW011813 · FIC · BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE-KALRO · PI Serap AKSOY, Paul O Mireji · 2023 to 2026
$995k
Expanding the toolbox for tsetse control in KenyaR01AI169503 · NIAID · BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE-KALRO · PI Paul O Mireji · 2022 to 2026
$727k
Molecular and functional characterization of olfaction genes in tsetse fliesR03TW009444 · FIC · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI AKSOY, SERAP · 2013 to 2015
$157k
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW011813FIC NIH HHS R03 TW009444NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI169503NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI115648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tsetse flies are major vectors of African trypanosomiasis, with devastating medical and veterinary consequences in sub-Saharan region of Africa. Insect repellents are promising tool for control of tsetse flies in the region. A four-component tsetse-repellent blend (δ-nonalactone, heptanoic acid, 4-methylguaiacol and geranyl acetone) previously formulated and optimized was encapsulated in β-cyclodextrin for a slow controlled release. Here, we explored various methods of microencapsulating (kneading, co-precipitation, heating or freeze-drying) tsetse fly repellent blend in β-cyclodextrin nanoparticles. We assessed release kinetics of the blends and individual compounds using Gas Chromatography linked with Flame Ionization Detector, and evaluated laboratory and field responses (repellence) of the flies by the encapsulated blends. We compared individual performances of releases kinetics of the encapsulated blend relative to non-encapsulated composites. Overall, kneading, co-precipitation, heating and freeze-drying micro-encapsulation techniques retained 72.0, 61.0, 59.5 and 57.3 % of the blend, respectively. Release rates of blends in 400- and 200-microns thick polythene sachets were 6.73 and 11.82 mg/h respectively, significantly (

Indexed as

controlled-releaseencapsulation techniquesMicroencapsulationnanoparticlesrelease-rateβ-cyclodextrin

Identifiers

PMID40842880
PMCPMC12366840

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.