Evidence mapPaperPMID 40842907Full record

ArticleInternational journal of preventive medicine2025

Anthropometric Indices and Diabetes Disease: Based on the Rafsanjan Cohort Study.

Fatemeh Ayoobi, Fatemeh Ranjbarhasanabadi, Parvin Khalili, Seyed Mahdi Pourtorabi, Zahra Jamali, Maryam Karimifard, Zahra Kamiab, Alireza Vakilian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of preventive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fatemeh AyoobiOccupational Safety and Health Research Center, NICICO, World Safety Organization and Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
Fatemeh RanjbarhasanabadiClinical Research Development Unit, Ali-Ibn Abi-Talib Hospital, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
Parvin KhaliliSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
Seyed Mahdi PourtorabiStudent Research Committee, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
Zahra JamaliPistachio Safety Research Center, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
Maryam KarimifardNon-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
Zahra KamiabDepartment of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
Alireza VakilianNon-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Various investigations have evaluated the predictive ability of different anthropometric indices for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) risk and the findings were inconsistent in different populations. This study investigated the relationship between anthropometric indicators and T2DM in the Rafsanjan Cohort Study. Methods: The present cross-sectional study included 9895 adults, aged 35-70 years, among them who have completed data, were studied. We obtained the data from the Rafsanjan Cohort Study (RCS), as a part of the prospective epidemiological research studies in Iran (PERSIAN). Fasting blood glucose >126 and use of glucose-lowering drugs were used from cohort data as T2DM. Anthropometric indices were compared for T2DM or prediabetes odds vs. normal group. Demographic characteristics and risk factors were compared in diabetes, prediabetes, and normal groups. Results: Of 9895 participants, about 23 (n = 2283) and 35% (n = 3455) of this population had T2DM and prediabetes, respectively. After adjusting for potential confounders, for waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) (OR = 3.25, 95% CI 2.68-3.94) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) (OR = 2.90, 95% CI 2.40-3.49), individuals in the highest quartile had a higher probability of developing T2DM than individuals in the lowest quartile. Also, the odds ratio of T2DM increased in participants with overweight, obesity, and abnormal waist circumference (WC) by considering a cutoff point. Conclusions: According to our findings, the strongest and weakest anthropometric indexes related to T2DM were WHR and WC, respectively.

Indexed as

Body mass indexprospective epidemiological research studies in Iran (PERSIAN)Rafsanjan Cohort Study (RCS)type 2 diabetes mellituswaist circumferencewaist-to-height ratiowaist-to-hip ratio

Identifiers

PMID40842907
PMCPMC12367262

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.