ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
Enhancing surgical object detection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy with explicit positional relationship modeling.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) is one of the most performed complex surgeries. Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into LC shows great potential for assisting in anatomical structure detection. To be dependable, AI must be accurate, robust, and effective. In this study, a relation-based model was proposed to enhance surgical object detection in LC images. The model employs a positional relation encoder and refines progressive attention mechanism to analyze object relationships. Two widely used LC datasets were selected to validate the proposed model. We strictly followed the official split and evaluator protocols for fair comparison with benchmark models. The Macroscopic Correlation (MC) results revealed distinct differences in position relation strength between the two datasets, enabling comprehensive evaluation of the proposed models under different circumstances. The experimental results demonstrated the accuracy and effectiveness of the proposed models in both datasets. The proposed model outperformed the best-performing benchmark model by an improvement of 33.95 % in overall mean Average Precision (AP) on the Endoscapes dataset. For classes Cystic Plate and HC Triangle, the detection AP was improved by 90.32 % and 92.46 %, respectively. For the m2cai16-tool-locations dataset, the proposed models also demonstrated effective performance, improving the overall mAP by up to 17.97 % compared to benchmark models. The experimental results proved the accuracy and effectiveness of the proposed model. Due to the analysis of position relation, the detection of key objects is significantly improved. The postprocessing steps effectively reduce redundant bounding boxes by over 90 %. Future work could focus on expanding to more clinical and practical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.