Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40843150›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbes2025

Katherine Pintor, Alexander Balinovic, Gabriele Malengo, Celina Klepin, Moritz Fleck, Timo Glatter, Ulrike Endesfelder, Andreas Diepold

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katherine PintorMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Department of Ecophysiology, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Alexander BalinovicInstitute for Microbiology and Biotechnology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 35115 Bonn, Germany.
Gabriele MalengoMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Flow Cytometry and Imaging Facility, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Celina KlepinMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Department of Ecophysiology, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Moritz FleckMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Department of Ecophysiology, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Timo GlatterMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Core Facility for Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Ulrike EndesfelderInstitute for Microbiology and Biotechnology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 35115 Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7801-6278
Andreas DiepoldMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Department of Ecophysiology, 35043 Marburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4475-3923

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gram-negative bacteria can use type III secretion systems to inject effector proteins into eukaryotic target cells. Most effectors are co-expressed with specific chaperone proteins that are required for the secretion of their cognate effector. Although chaperones share characteristics across species, no common mechanism of action has been identified. In particular, it remains unclear, if and how chaperones target effectors to the type III secretion injectisome. In this study, we analyzed the interaction network, cellular localization, mobility, and function of SycH and SycE, two

Indexed as

bacterial secretion systemsinfection biologypathogen–host interactionprotein interactionproximity labelingYersinia enterocolitica

Identifiers

PMID40843150
PMCPMC12366550

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.