ReviewJournal of gastroenterology2025
Evidence for imaging-based diagnosis of liver metastases from colorectal cancer.
Review in Journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emerging nano-immunotherapeutic strategies achieve metastatic colorectal cancer precision therapy.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metastatic liver tumors are more common than primary liver cancers and are the most common liver malignancies. Performing B-mode ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced computed tomography is generally necessary for the diagnosis of liver metastases. However, various modalities, including dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging using liver-specific contrast agents such as gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, and a combination of positron emission tomography and computed tomography, are also used. Improvements in imaging technology have made the detection of small liver masses possible, and liver metastases are being diagnosed more frequently, both before and after primary tumor treatment. The diagnosis of liver metastasis is related to treatment, and the benefits of liver resection depend on the primary tumor. For colorectal cancer, resection of liver metastases is beneficial. However, resection is not recommended for pancreatic or biliary tract cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40844549What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.