ArticleInvestigational new drugs2025
Clinical potential of antibody-drug conjugates in early-phase clinical trials for late-line treatment of advanced solid tumors.
Article in Investigational new drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP)-matched therapy and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have garnered increased attention. However, their response rates and prognoses in early-phase clinical trials are not yet widely appreciated in clinical practice. We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with advanced solid tumors who enrolled in clinical trials as a late-line treatment in our department between January 2020 and December 2023. This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes, including overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and associated prognostic factors. A total of 574 cases were referred, including 173 in the late-line setting. The ADCs group achieved the highest ORR and DCR (31.9% and 68.1%, respectively). ADCs also demonstrated a longer median progression-free survival (PFS) compared to CGP-matched and other trials (median PFS: ADCs 4.0 months vs. CGP-matched trials 1.9 months vs. others 1.7 months; p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified ADCs as significantly associated with improved PFS, while CGP-matched therapy was associated with better OS. The findings suggest that, even in early phase clinical trials for the late-line setting, ADCs can enhance therapeutic responses. These results underscore the need to avoid overreliance on CGP outcomes and instead prioritize early referral to Phase 1 facilities, timely intervention, and the appropriate inclusion of patients to achieve optimal clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40844673What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.