ArticleJAMA network open2025
Clinician Perspectives on AI-Generated Drafts of Patient Test Result Explanations.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Large language models for simplifying radiology reports: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient, public, and clinician evaluations.The Lancet. Digital health · 2026Pooled it
- Mapping Practice-Based Signals of Generative AI in Psychiatric Care: Qualitative Study of Korean Psychiatrists' Experiences, Interpretations, and Implementation Priorities.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparison of Emotional Content in Text Responses From Physicians and AI Chatbots to Patient Health Queries: Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Real World Human-LLM Interactions - Prospective blinded versus unblinded expert physician assessments of LLM responses to complex medical dilemmas.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Validation of an AI-powered mobile application for personalizing medical note explanations: a mixed-methods evaluation.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- The AI-educated patient.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.