Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40845048›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2025

Identifying clusters of multimorbid disease and differences by age, sex, and socioeconomic status: A systematic review.

Nataysia Mikula-Noble, Vicki Cormie, Rebecca Eilidh McCowan, Colin McCowan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nataysia Mikula-NobleDivision of Population and Behavioural Sciences, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7342-403X
Vicki CormieLibrary, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom.
Rebecca Eilidh McCowanSchool of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Colin McCowanDivision of Population and Behavioural Sciences, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9466-833X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of multimorbidity has been growing due to the ageing population and increasingly unhealthy lifestyles. There is interest in identifying clusters of disease and how they are influenced.

aimsThis systematic review aims to (i) investigate the most common clusters in the adult population with multimorbidity (ii) identify methods used to define clusters (iii) examine if clusters differ based on age, sex and socioeconomic status.

methodsWe searched Medline, Embase, SCOPUS, Web of Science Core Collection, and CINAHL using concepts of multimorbidity and clustering techniques to identify relevant papers. Secondary data, including commonly reported clustering techniques, identified clusters, and other characteristics were extracted. All studies were quality assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Bias scale.

resultsFrom a total of 24,231 papers, 125 were included in the review. There was a total of 918 different clusters identified, which were categorized into 59 broad groups. A cardiometabolic cluster appeared most frequently within the identified studies and across age strata. The most common clustering technique was Latent Class Analysis (n = 51). Disease cluster prevalence appeared to differ based on age, whereas no differences could be identified by sex.

conclusionAcross the 125 papers identified, irrespective of clustering method, a relatively common set of clusters of disease were found. The Cardiometabolic cluster was the most frequently identified cluster across all age groups. Studies that stratified participants by age or sex identified distinct clusters within each subgroup, which differed from those observed in clusters formed from the general adult population (18+).Latent class analysis was the most common clustering technique within this review, but it was not explored if different clustering methods led to different clusters. Further work is needed to distinguish the most prevalent clusters within specific stratified cohorts of different ages, sex, and socioeconomic status; nonetheless, data strongly suggests that there are different clusters that arise dependent on stratifications. With the expected increasing burden of multimorbidity, healthcare services may need to think about the most prevalent disease combinations within certain strata and how joint-specialist services can be tailored to treat those common conditions.

Indexed as

MultimorbiditySocial ClassAdultAgedAge FactorsCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID40845048
PMCPMC12373218

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.