ArticleJMIR human factors2025
Examining Patient Characteristics Associated With Digital Outpatient Care for Type 1 Diabetes (DigiDiaS): Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMIR human factors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Digital Outpatient Care for Patients With Type 1 Diabetes (DigiDiaS): Pragmatic Observational Pre-Post Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeople with type 1 diabetes require ongoing self-management and frequent follow-up care. Digital care models might offer flexible solutions and increased sustainability, and while the clinical opportunities of these care models have been explored, the characteristics of patients inclined to opt for digital care remain unclear.
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate which selected sociodemographic and disease-related patient characteristics are associated with opting for digital outpatient care among patients with type 1 diabetes.
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted at the endocrinology department of Akershus University Hospital in Norway, as part of a larger longitudinal study. Adult patients with type 1 diabetes were eligible to participate and were recruited consecutively. Patients could choose either a novel, mobile health-based, digital, tailored, outpatient care model (DigiDiaS care) or continuation of usual care. DigiDiaS care is delivered via an app comprising a message service; preconsultation questionnaires; options for physical, video, or telephone consultations; an information page; and an e-learning course. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected from the participants' medical records and the national diabetes registry. Self-reported data comprised self-management measured using the Patient Activation Measure 13 (PAM-13), diabetes distress (20-item Problem Areas in Diabetes; PAID-20), well-being (World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index; WHO-5), and health literacy (12-item short version of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire; HLS-19 Q12) questionnaires. We explored group differences and conducted logistic regression to identify factors associated with opting for DigiDiaS care versus usual care.
resultsA total of 237 patients consented to participate in the study, with 185 (78.1%) opting for DigiDiaS care and 52 (21.9%) opting for usual care. The DigiDiaS care group had a statistically significantly shorter duration of diabetes (median 19, range 0-51 years) compared with the usual care group (median 29, range 3-58 years; P<.001); higher proportions of users of insulin pumps than insulin pens for insulin delivery (DigiDiaS care: 74/185, 40%; usual care: 12/185, 23.1%; P=.007), and a lower median well-being care score (DigiDiaS care: median score 60, range 4-96; usual care: median score 68, range 16-100; P=.04). The DigiDiaS care and usual care groups did not differ in sociodemographic variables, presence of late complications from diabetes or comorbidities, self-management, diabetes distress, or health literacy.
conclusionsThis study reveals that most patients with type 1 diabetes choose digital outpatient care when it is offered. Our study suggests that those opting for DigiDiaS care are already familiar with using diabetes-related technology, have a shorter diabetes duration, and have lower well-being. It is essential to understand the characteristics of patients who opt for usual care to ensure high-quality health care services. Further studies should also focus on how the implementation of digital solutions in outpatient care can affect how and if patients use them. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/52766.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.