ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2025
Development and validation of a predictive model for new HIV infection screening among persons 15 years and above in primary healthcare settings in Kenya: a study protocol.
Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study seeks to determine incidence, comorbidities and drivers for new HIV infections to develop, test and validate a risk prediction model for screening for new cases of HIV. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study has two components: a cross-sectional study to develop the prediction model using the HIV dataset from the Kenya AIDS and STI Control Programme and a 15-month prospective study for the validation of the model. Inferential analysis will be conducted using algorithms that perform best in disease prediction: Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Multilayer Perceptron. Model sensitivity and specificity will be examined using the receiver operating characteristic curve, and performance will be evaluated using metrics: accuracy, precision, recall and F1 score. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study obtained ethical approval (JKU/ISERC/02321/1421) from the Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology Ethical and Research Board and a research licence (NACOSTI/P/24/414749) from the National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.