ArticleOpen heart2025
Machine-learning approach to atrial fibrillation prediction among individuals without prior cardiovascular diseases.
Article in Open heart, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting atrial fibrillation risk in middle-aged and older patients with coronary heart disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is a lack of atrial fibrillation (AF) prediction models tailored for individuals without prior cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) to facilitate early intervention. This study aimed to develop and validate an AF prediction model using machine-learning methods based on routine biomarkers in middle-aged individuals without overt CVD.
methodsData were derived from 122 822 individuals in the Swedish AMORIS (Apolipoprotein-Mortality Risk) cohort who were aged 40-65 years and without CVD diagnosis at baseline (1985-96) and followed for 20 years for incident AF. The sample was split into training and validation data sets. Random forest was used to identify AF predictors from 16 routine biomarkers covering lipids, liver/kidney markers, glucose control and inflammation.
results10 356 (8.4%) incident AF diagnosis occurred over a mean of 18.1 years (SD 4.4). Model performance increased sharply when adding the first seven predictors and plateaued when adding additional ones. Therefore, a final AF prediction model was established based on seven predictors: age, albumin, uric acid, triglycerides, glucose, alkaline phosphatase and sex. C-statistics of the final model were 0.82 (95% CI: 0.81 to 0.82) in the training and 0.71 (0.70 to 0.72) in the validation data set in predicting 20-year AF. The model was well-calibrated in the full sample and age and sex subgroups.
conclusionsA new AF prediction model was established using seven biomarkers from a population without pre-existing CVDs, thus complementing currently available AF prediction models. These markers are readily accessible in primary and specialist care and demonstrate acceptable performance in predicting short- and long-term AF risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.