ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning enhanced expert system for detecting heart failure decompensation using patient reported vitals and electronic health records.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Mechanisms and Multi-Omics Integration in Heart Failure: From Pathophysiology to Precision Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Implementation of Machine Learning in Heart Failure Trials.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
- Machine Learning in Adapted Physical Activity: Clinical Applications, Monitoring, and Implementation Pathways for Personalized Exercise in Chronic Conditions: A Narrative Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Review
- Symptoms and causes of obstacles in AI-based telemonitoring: strategies for system development through a CRISP-DM lens.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Diagnostics, Monitoring, and Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) is a condition with periods of stability interrupted by periods of worsening symptoms, known as decompensation episodes. Digital interventions are promising tools to alleviate burdens on HF management through automated alerts at the earliest decompensation sign. To accomplish this, our lab developed Medly, an expert system-enhanced digital therapeutic program for HF patients. Medly's algorithm is a knowledge-based system that analyzes weight, blood pressure, and heart rate and sends automated alerts to clinicians and patients if deterioration is identified. Rules were set conservatively to account for false negatives. However, reducing false negatives resulted in an increase in false positives, which can lead to unnecessary clinical workload. Further, patients' electronic health records (EHR) were not used when developing the rules-based algorithm. This study aimed to enhance Medly's performance with machine learning and include a richer set of data, including EHR, for predicting decompensated HF episodes. We performed a retrospective study using XGBoost for the binary classification of whether the patient needed to be contacted for a possible decompensation episode. Features included blood pressure, weight change, heart rate, and EHR data (e.g., blood work, medication history). We further performed interpretability analysis to investigate the importance of including EHR data in the model. The enhanced algorithm achieved 98.08% accuracy, 95.26% sensitivity, 98.86% specificity, and a PPV of 88.18% - a marked improvement over the 55.8% in the rules-based algorithm. EHR data, mainly B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and total cholesterol, was crucial in predicting decompensation and correcting false-positive alerting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.