ArticleNature communications2025
Separable neural signals for reward and emotion prediction errors.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emotional Context Modulates Neural Prediction-Error Encoding.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
- Article
- A dynamic affective surprise signal influences episodic memory.Cognition · 2026Article
- Affective valence as a computational signal for learning value.Communications psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reinforcement learning models focus on reward prediction errors as the driver of behavior. However, recent evidence indicates that deviations from emotion expectations, termed affective prediction errors, also crucially shape behavior. Whether there is neural separability between emotion and reward signals remains unknown. We employ electroencephalography during social learning to investigate the neural signatures of reward and affective prediction errors. Behavioral results reveal that affective prediction errors are associated with choices when little is known about how a partner will behave. This behavioral evidence is mirrored neurally by engagement of separate event-related potentials. More specifically, the feedback-related negativity is largely and consistently indexed by reward prediction errors, while the P3b is more consistently tracked by affective prediction errors. The P3b in particular is linked to subsequent choices, highlighting the mechanistic influence of emotion during social learning. These findings present evidence for a neurobiologically viable emotion learning signal that is partially distinguishable, at both the behavior and neural levels, from reward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.