Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40846850›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Conserved function of the HAUS6 calponin homology domain in anchoring augmin for microtubule branching.

Martin Würtz, Giulia Tonon, Bram J A Vermeulen, Maja Zezlina, Qi Gao, Annett Neuner, Angelika Seidl, Melanie König, Maximilian Harkenthal, Sebastian Eustermann and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Alkylamidobetaines Induced Changes in Multidrug-Resistant, BiofilmingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. The γ-TuRC: mastermind of multipurpose actions at the centrosome.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Martin Würtz *Zentrum für Molekulare Biologie der Universität Heidelberg (ZMBH), Heidelberg, Germany. m.wuertz@zmbh.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4504-4723
Giulia Tonon *Zentrum für Molekulare Biologie der Universität Heidelberg (ZMBH), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7776-4525
Bram J A VermeulenZentrum für Molekulare Biologie der Universität Heidelberg (ZMBH), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9798-6245
Maja ZezlinaZentrum für Molekulare Biologie der Universität Heidelberg (ZMBH), Heidelberg, Germany.
Qi GaoZentrum für Molekulare Biologie der Universität Heidelberg (ZMBH), Heidelberg, Germany.
Annett NeunerZentrum für Molekulare Biologie der Universität Heidelberg (ZMBH), Heidelberg, Germany.
Angelika SeidlZoological Institute, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.
Melanie KönigBiochemie-Zentrum der Universität Heidelberg (BZH), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4135-2411
Maximilian HarkenthalZentrum für Molekulare Biologie der Universität Heidelberg (ZMBH), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-0350-8033
Sebastian EustermannEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4439-7770
Sylvia ErhardtZoological Institute, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3169-241X
Fabio LolicatoDepartment of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7537-0549
Elmar SchiebelZentrum für Molekulare Biologie der Universität Heidelberg (ZMBH), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3683-247X
Stefan PfefferZentrum für Molekulare Biologie der Universität Heidelberg (ZMBH), Heidelberg, Germany. s.pfeffer@zmbh.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5843-2795

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) DFG PF 963/1-4Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) DFG PF 963/4-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Branching microtubule nucleation is a key mechanism for mitotic and meiotic spindle assembly and requires the hetero-octameric augmin complex. Augmin recruits the major microtubule nucleator, the γ-tubulin ring complex, to pre-existing microtubules to direct the formation of new microtubules in a defined orientation. Although recent structural work has provided key insights into the structural organization of augmin, molecular details of its interaction with microtubules remain elusive. Here, we identify the minimal conserved microtubule-binding unit of augmin across species and demonstrate that stable microtubule anchoring is predominantly mediated via the calponin homology (CH) domain in Dgt6/HAUS6. Comparative sequence and functional analyses in vitro and in vivo reveal a highly conserved functional role of the HAUS6 CH domain in microtubule binding. Using cryo-electron microscopy and molecular dynamics simulations in combination with AlphaFold structure predictions, we show that the D. melanogaster Dgt6/HAUS6 CH domain binds microtubules at the inter-protofilament groove between two adjacent β-tubulin subunits and thereby orients augmin on microtubules. Altogether, our findings reveal how augmin binds microtubules to pre-determine the branching angle during microtubule nucleation and facilitate the rapid assembly of complex microtubule networks.

Indexed as

Calcium-Binding ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsMicrofilament ProteinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMicrotubulesAnimalsCalponinsCryoelectron MicroscopyDrosophila melanogasterHumansMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein BindingProtein DomainsTubulinCalcium-Binding ProteinsCalponinsDrosophila ProteinsMicrofilament ProteinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsTubulin

Identifiers

PMID40846850
PMCPMC12373997

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.