Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40846906›Full record

ArticleNature computational science2025

Exploiting pleiotropy to enhance variant discovery with functional false discovery rates.

Andrew J Bass, Chris Wallace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature computational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew J BassDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. ab3105@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7762-4055
Chris WallaceDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. cew54@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9755-1703

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cost of recruiting participants for genome-wide association studies (GWASs) can limit sample sizes and hinder the discovery of genetic variants. Here we introduce the surrogate functional false discovery rate (sfFDR) framework that integrates summary statistics of related traits to increase power. The sfFDR framework provides estimates of FDR quantities such as the functional local FDR and q value, and uses these estimates to derive a functional P value for type I error rate control and a functional local Bayes' factor for post-GWAS analyses. Compared with a standard analysis, sfFDR substantially increased power (equivalent to a 52% increase in sample size) in a study of obesity-related traits from the UK Biobank and discovered eight additional lead SNPs near genes linked to immune-related responses in a rare disease GWAS of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Collectively, these results highlight the utility of exploiting related traits in both small and large studies.

Indexed as

Genetic PleiotropyGenome-Wide Association StudyBayes TheoremGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic VariationHumansObesityPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID40846906
PMCPMC12457191

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.