ArticleReproductive health2025
"Invisible wounds of childbirth"; women's experiences of obstetric violence: a phenomenological qualitative study.
Article in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Obstetric Violence Through the Perspectives of Women and Midwives in Hospital Birth Settings: A Qualitative Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
aimObstetric violence includes physical, verbal, emotional and sexual abuse against women during on labor process, and other negative practices such as violation of privacy, non-consensual interventions and discriminatory care. There are few studies on women's experiences of obstetric violence during on labor process. The aim of this study is to investigate the feelings, thoughts and experiences of women who reported being exposed to obstetric violence at any stage of labor.
methodsData were collected using a constructivist qualitative research design. The interview data were transcribed and then subjected to qualitative content analysis in accordance with Standards for Qualitative Research Reporting (SRQR) using Graneheim and Lundman's content analysis method. The qualitative research software package ATLAS.ti 9 was used for the analysis.
resultsThe study interviewed 21 women. The analysis of the interviewees' narratives revealed four distinct categories and 13 sub-categories. The four categories were obstetric violence, prevention of participation on labor process, inability to meet professional standards of care, and the woman's emotional state after obstetric violence.
conclusionThe study revealed that women in Turkey are exposed to obstetric violence during the the labor process and that this experience can be addressed in various dimensions. Having experienced obstetric violence, the women reported postpartum emotional reactions such as trauma, fear, anger and frustration. However, despite these negative experiences, some women expressed the joy of motherhood and the happiness and gratitude of being reunited with their baby. Better quality assurance is needed to protect the rights of women in labor and ensure a positive birth experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.