Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40847398›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Scoping review of nurse triage in primary care.

Hannah Park, Dong-Soo Shin, Carrie Wade, David Bao-Long Duong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bridging Gaps in Acute Care Access for Rural Veterans: The Reach and Impact of VA's Virtual Emergency and Urgent Care Programs.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hannah ParkCollege of Nursing, Dongguk University, Gyeongju, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2685-5747
Dong-Soo ShinHallym University School of Nursing, Gangwon, South Korea. shindong@hallym.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5289-3571
Carrie WadeHarvard Medical School, Boston, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5972-7242
David Bao-Long DuongHarvard Medical School, Boston, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5386-4502

Funding

Hallym university research fund HRF-201807-012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTriage in the primary care setting is critical for ensuring timely access to and continuity of care for patients. This scoping review examines how nurse triage is implemented, including the types of nurses involved, settings, triage algorithms, classification systems, and outcomes.

methodsA search of five electronic databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central, was conducted in July 2025.

resultsThirty-seven studies were included, and a narrative synthesis was used for data analysis. Nurse triage in primary care involves registered nurses, advanced practice nurses, nurse practitioners, and nurse specialists, working alone or in teams with doctors, administrative staff, or other healthcare professionals. Three types of triage algorithms were identified. Triage classification systems typically consist of 3 to 5 levels, including urgent, routine, or self-care. Computerized triage tools have been introduced in some countries. Nurses tended to overrefer pregnant women and febrile children. Overall, patients were generally satisfied with nurse triage services. This scoping review identified four key themes in primary care triage: team triage, triage algorithms, patient safety, and quality assurance.

conclusionNurse triage in primary care serves as a first and continuous point of contact for patients and ensures patient safety by providing quality care. To improve the quality of nurse triage in primary care, team-based triage and triage nurse education and training would be beneficial.

Indexed as

NursesPrimary health careScoping reviewTriage

Identifiers

PMID40847398
PMCPMC12372265

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.