ArticleBMC nursing2025
Scoping review of nurse triage in primary care.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient safety practices in an innovative digital landscape: an interview study on triage in Swedish digital primary care.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- Digital Dental Triage and Access to Care: A Qualitative Study of Experiences in a Teaching Hospital.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Bridging Gaps in Acute Care Access for Rural Veterans: The Reach and Impact of VA's Virtual Emergency and Urgent Care Programs.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026Article
- Juggling conflicting demands: registered nurses' experiences of goal conflicts in acute illness consultations in primary care - a thematic analysis.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Nurse Roles in Virtual Care Within Team-Based Primary Care: Qualitative Findings From a Multiple Case Study in Two Canadian Jurisdictions.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTriage in the primary care setting is critical for ensuring timely access to and continuity of care for patients. This scoping review examines how nurse triage is implemented, including the types of nurses involved, settings, triage algorithms, classification systems, and outcomes.
methodsA search of five electronic databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central, was conducted in July 2025.
resultsThirty-seven studies were included, and a narrative synthesis was used for data analysis. Nurse triage in primary care involves registered nurses, advanced practice nurses, nurse practitioners, and nurse specialists, working alone or in teams with doctors, administrative staff, or other healthcare professionals. Three types of triage algorithms were identified. Triage classification systems typically consist of 3 to 5 levels, including urgent, routine, or self-care. Computerized triage tools have been introduced in some countries. Nurses tended to overrefer pregnant women and febrile children. Overall, patients were generally satisfied with nurse triage services. This scoping review identified four key themes in primary care triage: team triage, triage algorithms, patient safety, and quality assurance.
conclusionNurse triage in primary care serves as a first and continuous point of contact for patients and ensures patient safety by providing quality care. To improve the quality of nurse triage in primary care, team-based triage and triage nurse education and training would be beneficial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.