Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40847404›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2025

Machine learning framework for investigating nano- and micro-scale particle diffusion in colonic mucus.

Marco Tjakra, Kristína Lidayová, Christophe Avenel, Christel A S Bergström, Shakhawath Hossain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marco TjakraDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala Biomedical Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, 751 23, Sweden.
Kristína LidayováDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Christophe AvenelDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Christel A S BergströmDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala Biomedical Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, 751 23, Sweden.
Shakhawath HossainDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala Biomedical Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, 751 23, Sweden. shakhawath.hossain@uu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biosimilar artificial mucus models that mimic native mucus facilitate efficient, lab-based drug diffusion studies, addressing the costly and challenging preclinical phase of drug development, especially for nano- and micro-scale particle-based colonic drug delivery. This study presents a machine-learning-driven framework that integrates microrheological features into diffusional fingerprinting to characterize nano- and micro-scale particle diffusion patterns in mucus and assess the effect of mucus microrheology on such movements. We investigated the diffusion of fluorescent-labeled polystyrene particles in native pig mucus and two artificial mucus models. Particles (100, 200, and 1000 nm in diameter) with carboxylate- or amine-modified surfaces were tracked during passive diffusion. From each particle trajectory, 20 features -including microrheology-based parameters- were extracted. Based on these features, seven supervised machine learning models were applied to classify or identify similarities among mucus hydrogels. Of these, gradient boosting achieved the highest accuracy. SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis identified creep compliance as the most influential feature in distinguishing the mucus models. In native mucus, smaller negatively charged nanoparticles exhibited the highest mobility, with fewer particles being in the immobile and subdiffusive states. Microrheology data further indicated that larger particles experienced greater restriction owing to the elastic properties of native mucus. In contrast, smaller particles interacted more with the viscous liquid phase. A comprehensive feature-wide analysis revealed that hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC)-based artificial mucus more closely resembled native pig mucus than the polyacrylic acid-based model. In conclusion, the machine-learning-driven fingerprinting approach, incorporating microrheological features, successfully differentiated the microstructural characteristics and rheological properties of the three mucus models. It also supported the selection of HEC-based artificial mucus as a viable substitute for native colonic mucus.

Indexed as

ColonMachine LearningMucusNanoparticlesAnimalsDiffusionDrug Delivery SystemsHydrogelsParticle SizePolystyrenesRheologySwineHydrogelsPolystyrenesDiffusionMachine learningMucusNanoparticlesRheology

Identifiers

PMID40847404
PMCPMC12372352

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.