ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2025
Machine learning framework for investigating nano- and micro-scale particle diffusion in colonic mucus.
Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Biosimilars: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Applications.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Metal-ion-coordinated silk fibroin nanogels for enhanced oral chemotherapy of colorectal cancer.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biosimilar artificial mucus models that mimic native mucus facilitate efficient, lab-based drug diffusion studies, addressing the costly and challenging preclinical phase of drug development, especially for nano- and micro-scale particle-based colonic drug delivery. This study presents a machine-learning-driven framework that integrates microrheological features into diffusional fingerprinting to characterize nano- and micro-scale particle diffusion patterns in mucus and assess the effect of mucus microrheology on such movements. We investigated the diffusion of fluorescent-labeled polystyrene particles in native pig mucus and two artificial mucus models. Particles (100, 200, and 1000 nm in diameter) with carboxylate- or amine-modified surfaces were tracked during passive diffusion. From each particle trajectory, 20 features -including microrheology-based parameters- were extracted. Based on these features, seven supervised machine learning models were applied to classify or identify similarities among mucus hydrogels. Of these, gradient boosting achieved the highest accuracy. SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis identified creep compliance as the most influential feature in distinguishing the mucus models. In native mucus, smaller negatively charged nanoparticles exhibited the highest mobility, with fewer particles being in the immobile and subdiffusive states. Microrheology data further indicated that larger particles experienced greater restriction owing to the elastic properties of native mucus. In contrast, smaller particles interacted more with the viscous liquid phase. A comprehensive feature-wide analysis revealed that hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC)-based artificial mucus more closely resembled native pig mucus than the polyacrylic acid-based model. In conclusion, the machine-learning-driven fingerprinting approach, incorporating microrheological features, successfully differentiated the microstructural characteristics and rheological properties of the three mucus models. It also supported the selection of HEC-based artificial mucus as a viable substitute for native colonic mucus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.