ArticleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2025
Prenatal evaluation, diagnosis and management of fetal corpus callosal abnormalities: international Delphi consensus.
Article in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The incremental yield of CMA over karyotype in fetal ventriculomegaly: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Pooled it
- The Incremental Yield of CMA Over Karyotype in Fetal Growth Restriction-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Pooled it
- Prenatal Ultrasound Screening for Corpus Callosum Anomalies: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Determinants of successful midsagittal visualization of the fetal corpus callosum using 2D transabdominal ultrasound.BMC medical imaging · 2026Observational
- Toward structured fellowships in fetal neuroimaging.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe corpus callosum (CC) is an interhemispheric structure that facilitates communication between the two cerebral hemispheres. Anomalies of the CC are frequent and associated with a wide spectrum of altered neurodevelopmental outcomes. However, variability in diagnostic criteria and the lack of standardized management strategies create challenges for clinicians and anxiety for expectant parents. This study aimed to establish an international consensus on the prenatal evaluation, diagnosis and management of fetal CC abnormalities using a structured Delphi methodology.
methodsA three-round Delphi process was conducted among an international panel of fetal medicine experts, identified based on clinical expertise and publication history. Structured statements regarding CC evaluation, diagnosis and management were developed through expert input and a scoping literature review. The statements were iteratively refined and scored by the panel using a five-point Likert scale in the first two rounds. During the final round, consensus was defined as > 70% agreement among participants.
resultsFifty-five experts participated in the first round, with 43 (78.2%) experts completing the entire process. Key consensus findings included the incorporation of obtaining a sagittal view of the brain in routine ultrasound screening (72.4% agreement), without requiring measurement even when an anomaly is suspected (93.1% agreement), but instead with recommended referral to a specialist (100% agreement). For diagnostic ultrasound, three-dimensional ultrasound imaging (72.4% agreement) and transvaginal ultrasound evaluation (82.8% agreement) were recommended, with targeted measurements of CC length in the case of a subjective impression of abnormal size (82.8% agreement). However, it was agreed that there is no consensus on the reference chart or cut-off values to be used for defining abnormal CC length (86.2% and 89.3% agreement, respectively). In terms of management, it was agreed that both an invasive genetic workup and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be offered in case of suspected dysgenesis of the CC (100% agreement). MRI should be performed if the CC appears to be too short (100% agreement), thin (100% agreement) or thick (92.0% agreement). In the case of an isolated CC with heterogeneous echogenicity, an infectious workup is recommended (86.2% agreement).
conclusionThis study provides a structured framework for the evaluation and management of fetal CC abnormalities. By standardizing approaches to imaging and management, the recommendations aim to improve diagnostic accuracy, optimize patient outcomes and reduce unnecessary interventions. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these recommendations and assess their impact on clinical care. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.