Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40847798›Full record

SynthesisJournal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)2025

RECOVER Guidelines: Newborn Resuscitation in Dogs and Cats. Evidence and Knowledge Gap Analysis With Treatment Recommendations.

Manuel Boller, Jamie M Burkitt-Creedon, Christopher G Byers, Daniel J Fletcher, Kate S Farrell, Autumn P Davidson, Suzanne Fricke, Giovanna Bassu, Sophie A Grundy, Cheryl Lopate and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. RECOVER Guidelines: Newborn Resuscitation in Dogs and Cats. Clinical Guidelines.Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001) · 2025
    Guideline
  3. RECOVER Guidelines: First Aid in Dogs and Cats. Evidence and Knowledge Gap Analysis With Treatment Recommendations.Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Manuel BollerVCA Canada Central Victoria Veterinary Hospital, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1879-4625
Jamie M Burkitt-CreedonDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3726-0706
Christopher G ByersCriticalCareDVM.com, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Daniel J FletcherDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8382-5910
Kate S FarrellDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8536-2443
Autumn P DavidsonDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Suzanne FrickeHealth Sciences Library, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington, USA.
Giovanna BassuTherio VT Care, Rixensart, Belgium.
Sophie A GrundyBanfield Pet Hospital, Sacramento, California, USA.
Cheryl LopateReproductive Revolutions and Wilsonville Veterinary Clinic, Wilsonville, Oregon, USA.
Maria C VeronesiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6062-6692
RECOVER Newborn Resuscitation Domain Evidence Evaluators

Funding

Boehringer Ingelheim Animal HealthZoetis Animal Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically review the evidence on, to devise clinical recommendations for, and to identify critical knowledge gaps in resuscitation of newborn puppies and kittens.

designStandardized, systematic evaluation of literature pertinent to newborn resuscitation following Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Prioritized questions were reviewed by Evidence Evaluators, and findings were reconciled by Domain Chairs and Reassessment Campaign on Veterinary Resuscitation (RECOVER) Co-Chairs to arrive at treatment recommendations commensurate with the quality of evidence, risk-benefit relationship, and clinical feasibility. This process was implemented using an evidence profile worksheet for each question that included an introduction, consensus on science, treatment recommendations, justification for these recommendations, and important knowledge gaps. Treatment recommendations underwent a modified Delphi consensus process and were then distributed to veterinary professionals for comment for 2 weeks prior to finalization.

settingTransdisciplinary, international collaboration in university, specialty, and emergency veterinary practice.

resultsTwenty-eight questions pertaining to temperature management, respiratory and metabolic support, and CPR were addressed. Of the 59 treatment recommendations formulated, 21 concerned medications, 20 addressed respiratory measures, 20 provided guidance on CPR, and 3 related to temperature management. Taken together, the recommendations emphasize the importance of early administration of bag-mask ventilation in nonvigorous, severely bradycardic newborn puppies and kittens. Most recommendations are either expert opinion (n = 28) or based on very low quality of evidence (n = 26).

conclusionsSignificant uncertainty remains regarding most resuscitative interventions in newborn puppies and kittens at birth. However, through a comprehensive evaluation of the evidence and a consensus process that included considerations of feasibility, the resulting treatment recommendations lay the foundation for clear, actionable guidance in small animal newborn resuscitation. In addition, a list of prioritized knowledge gaps was identified to guide collaborative clinical research to overcome the significant lack of veterinary scientific data at present.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesDog DiseasesPractice Guidelines as TopicResuscitationVeterinary MedicineAnimalsAnimals, NewbornCatsDogsbirthcardiopulmonary resuscitationCesarean sectionconsensus guidelinesevidence‐based veterinary medicineneonatal resuscitation

Identifiers

PMID40847798
PMCPMC12374491

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.