ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2025
A Review of Clinical Studies of Stromal Vascular Fraction for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis with a Follow-up Period of Over Two Years.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adipose-Derived Stromal Cells for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Study of Clinical Outcomes and Predictive Factors.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Long-Term Efficacy of Stromal Vascular Fraction in Osteoarthritis: A Critical Appraisal of Current Evidence and Future Directions.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Article
- Trends and inequities in fall- and musculoskeletal disorder-related mortality among U.S. adults aged 65 years and older, 1999-2023.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
OA (Osteoarthritis), a degenerative joint disease, causes significant pain and functional impairment, with current treatments often falling short in achieving long-term efficacy. This review summarizes clinical studies evaluating the use of the SVF (stromal vascular fraction), a heterogeneous cell population derived from autologous adipose tissue, in OA treatment with follow-up of over two years. Clinical evaluations included imaging detection (X-ray, MRI) and evaluation, and functional scale scoring (VAS, WOMAC, KOOS). Most studies reported significant pain relieve and joint function improvements up to 2-5 years, with minimal adverse reactions. From the summary results of therapeutic effects, it can be seen that OA patient with younger age, lower BMI (body mass index), and less severe OA (K-L stage II-III) will achieve better clinical treatment effects. Patients with large cartilage defects or advanced stages (K-L stage IV) had limited benefits. Long-term efficacy plateaued after 2-3 years, highlighting the need for potential retreatment. Combined use with fibrin glue or PRP (platelet rich plasma) showed enhanced local retention and cartilage repair signals. Despite variability in preparation methods and evaluation scales, SVF emerges as a safe, autologous option to alleviate symptoms and delay joint replacement. Standardized protocols and larger, long-term follow-up trials are warranted to optimize clinical application to achieve better clinical effect and possibility to explore the therapeutic mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40848103What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.