Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40848293›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2025

Morphometric analysis of spina bifida after fetal repair shows new subtypes with associated outcomes.

L K Mann, S Pandiri, N Agarwal, H Northrup, K S Au, E Grundberg, E P Bergh, M T Austin, R Patel, B Miller and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

L K MannUTHealth Houston Fetal Institute, Division of Fetal Intervention, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
S PandiriUTHealth Houston Fetal Institute, Division of Fetal Intervention, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
N AgarwalUTHealth Houston Fetal Institute, Division of Fetal Intervention, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
H NorthrupDepartment of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
K S AuDepartment of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
E GrundbergGenomic Medicine Center, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.
E P BerghUTHealth Houston Fetal Institute, Division of Fetal Intervention, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth Houston, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6276-854X
M T AustinDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
R PatelNeuroradiology Section, Department of Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
B MillerDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
S ZhuUTHealth Houston Fetal Institute, Division of Fetal Intervention, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
J S FeinbergUTHealth Houston Fetal Institute, Division of Fetal Intervention, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
D LaiDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, UTHealth Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
K TsaoDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
S A FletcherDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
R PapannaUTHealth Houston Fetal Institute, Division of Fetal Intervention, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth Houston, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3801-346X

Funding

Human Umbilical Cord as a Regenerative Meningeal Patch to Prevent Tethering and Improve Neurological Function Following In-Utero Spina Bifida RepairR01HD105173 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI PAPANNA, RAMESHA · 2021 to 2025
$3.2M
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development 1R01HD105173NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD105173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe binary classification of spina bifida lesions as myelomeningocele (with sac) or myeloschisis (without sac) belies a spectrum of morphologies. This study aimed to characterize types of spina bifida lesion and correlate them with preoperative presentation and postoperative outcome.

methodsThis was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of patients referred for fetal spina bifida who underwent fetoscopic repair between 2020 and 2023 at a single center. We evaluated lesion morphology on high-resolution intraoperative images and videos to categorize lesions based on placode exposure and nerve root stretching. The reproducibility of lesion classification was assessed using the Kappa statistic (κ) to measure interrater agreement between a primary and a secondary reviewer, and among two additional reviewers. Preoperative characteristics analyzed included largest ventricular diameter, tonsillar herniation level, movement of the lower extremities and lesion dimensions. Outcomes collected included duration of surgery, need for patch-based skin closure, gestational age at delivery, occurrence of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM), length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and neonatal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion.

resultsOf 60 lesions repaired during the study period, 57 had high-quality images available and were included in the analysis. We distinguished five types of lesion that differed according to the extent of nerve root stretching and neural placode exposure. The primary and secondary reviewers classified lesions with almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.854). Fetal characteristics that differed between lesion types at preoperative evaluation included lesion volume (P < 0.001), tonsillar herniation (P = 0.005) and head circumference percentile (P = 0.001). Lesion level, prevalence of talipes and movement of the lower extremities did not differ according to lesion type. Regarding surgical and perinatal outcomes, need for patch-based skin closure (P < 0.001), gestational age at delivery (P = 0.002) and length of stay in the NICU (P = 0.001) differed according to lesion type, whereas the rates of PPROM, CSF leakage at birth and CSF diversion in the NICU did not. On linear regression analysis, the severity of ventriculomegaly was associated with lesion type, but not with tonsillar herniation level.

conclusionsThere is a distinct phenotypic spectrum in open spina bifida. The severity of ventriculomegaly is associated with lesion type, rather than tonsillar herniation level. Our findings have expanded the classification of spina bifida to reveal a spectrum that warrants further study. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Indexed as

FetoscopySpinal DysraphismAdultFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornMeningomyelocelePregnancyPremature Rupture of Fetal MembranesProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, Prenatalin‐utero spina bifida repairlower motor functionmyelomeningocelemyeloschisisneural placodespina bifida lesionventriculomegaly

Identifiers

PMID40848293
PMCPMC12488205

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.