Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40848485›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2025

Optimizing phage therapy for Salmonella Pullorum: dosage, timing, and pharmacokinetics define treatment efficacy in SPF chickens.

Lulu Li, Mengrui Zhang, Yumei Cai, Zhengjie Liu, Zhaohui Tang, Zhipeng Zhang, Yujia Liu, Caihong Zhao, Xiaoqing Yu, Bent Petersen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lulu LiShandong Key Laboratory of Animal Disease Control and Breeding, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China; China-UK Joint Laboratory of Phage Engineering, Sino-Danish Joint Laboratory of Microbial Informatics, Jinan 250100, China.
Mengrui ZhangShandong Key Laboratory of Animal Disease Control and Breeding, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China; China-UK Joint Laboratory of Phage Engineering, Sino-Danish Joint Laboratory of Microbial Informatics, Jinan 250100, China,; College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 272018, China.
Yumei CaiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 272018, China.
Zhengjie LiuChina-UK Joint Laboratory of Phage Engineering, Sino-Danish Joint Laboratory of Microbial Informatics, Jinan 250100, China,; Becky Mayer Centre for Phage Research, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom.
Zhaohui TangShandong Key Laboratory of Animal Disease Control and Breeding, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China; China-UK Joint Laboratory of Phage Engineering, Sino-Danish Joint Laboratory of Microbial Informatics, Jinan 250100, China.
Zhipeng ZhangShandong Key Laboratory of Animal Disease Control and Breeding, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China; China-UK Joint Laboratory of Phage Engineering, Sino-Danish Joint Laboratory of Microbial Informatics, Jinan 250100, China,; College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 272018, China.
Yujia LiuShandong Key Laboratory of Animal Disease Control and Breeding, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China; China-UK Joint Laboratory of Phage Engineering, Sino-Danish Joint Laboratory of Microbial Informatics, Jinan 250100, China,; College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 272018, China.
Caihong ZhaoShandong Key Laboratory of Animal Disease Control and Breeding, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China; China-UK Joint Laboratory of Phage Engineering, Sino-Danish Joint Laboratory of Microbial Informatics, Jinan 250100, China,; College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 272018, China.
Xiaoqing YuShandong Key Laboratory of Animal Disease Control and Breeding, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China; China-UK Joint Laboratory of Phage Engineering, Sino-Danish Joint Laboratory of Microbial Informatics, Jinan 250100, China.
Bent PetersenChina-UK Joint Laboratory of Phage Engineering, Sino-Danish Joint Laboratory of Microbial Informatics, Jinan 250100, China,; Center for Evolutionary Hologenomics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 1165, Denmark.
Thomas Sicheritz-PonténChina-UK Joint Laboratory of Phage Engineering, Sino-Danish Joint Laboratory of Microbial Informatics, Jinan 250100, China,; Center for Evolutionary Hologenomics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 1165, Denmark.
Martha R J ClokieChina-UK Joint Laboratory of Phage Engineering, Sino-Danish Joint Laboratory of Microbial Informatics, Jinan 250100, China,; Becky Mayer Centre for Phage Research, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom.
Yuqing LiuShandong Key Laboratory of Animal Disease Control and Breeding, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China; China-UK Joint Laboratory of Phage Engineering, Sino-Danish Joint Laboratory of Microbial Informatics, Jinan 250100, China,. Electronic address: liuiuqing@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phage therapy has emerged as a highly effective antibiotic alternative for treating Salmonella infections; however, research into how phage dosage, administration timing, and frequency influence therapeutic efficacy-along with phage pharmacokinetics-remains limited. In this study, we established a Salmonella Pullorum infection model in specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chickens to investigate these parameters, alongside the therapeutic efficacy and pharmacokinetic distribution of the phage. The study consisted of two sequential experiments: trial 1 systematically evaluated the effects of phage dosage, administration timing, and frequency on treatment outcomes, leading to the identification of an optimal dosing regimen. This optimized regimen was then applied in trial 2, which focused on characterizing the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles of phage vB_SalS_JNS02 in SPF chickens. The results demonstrated that phage dosage, administration timing, and frequency significantly influenced survival rates: prophylactic administration was more effective than delayed treatment, and notably, higher doses did not consistently yield superior outcomes when administered at the same time point. Phage treatment effectively reduced Salmonella colonization in the blood, tissues, and intestines, achieving complete clearance of the pathogen from the brain and blood within 2-3 days post-challenge, and from the heart and ileum by day 5. Furthermore, phage therapy restored intestinal morphological parameters-including villus height and crypt depth-to levels comparable with those of uninfected controls, while simultaneously mitigating Salmonella-induced histopathological damage and promoting tissue repair. Interestingly, although phage administration altered the composition and abundance of specific gut microbiota taxa, it exerted no significant impact on alpha diversity. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that orally administered phages rapidly entered the systemic circulation and tissues, reaching peak concentrations at 4 hours post-administration. Phages were completely cleared from the blood by day 5 but remained detectable in the lungs, kidneys, spleen, and liver until the final observation time point (day 9). Collectively, these findings indicate that phage JNS02 exhibits favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics properties, positioning it as a promising antibiotic alternative and a candidate for clinical use in treating Salmonella infections.

Indexed as

ChickensPhage TherapyPoultry DiseasesSalmonellaSalmonella entericaSalmonella Infections, AnimalSalmonella PhagesAnimalsSpecific Pathogen-Free OrganismsPhage therapyPharmacodynamicPharmacokineticSalmonella Pullorum

Identifiers

PMID40848485
PMCPMC12398828

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.