Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40849005›Full record

ArticleExperimental eye research2025

Epithelial and mesenchymal progenitor cells in normal and inflamed human lacrimal glands.

Mohammad Gufran Siddiqui, Tejaswini Pingali, Saumya Jakati, Vivek Singh, Sayan Basu, Swati Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental eye research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohammad Gufran SiddiquiCenter for Ocular Regeneration (CORE), Prof. Brien Holden Eye Research Centre (BHERC), L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Tejaswini PingaliCenter for Ocular Regeneration (CORE), Prof. Brien Holden Eye Research Centre (BHERC), L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India; Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, India.
Saumya JakatiOphthalmic Pathology Laboratory, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Vivek SinghCenter for Ocular Regeneration (CORE), Prof. Brien Holden Eye Research Centre (BHERC), L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Sayan BasuCenter for Ocular Regeneration (CORE), Prof. Brien Holden Eye Research Centre (BHERC), L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India; Shantilal Shanghvi Cornea Institute, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Swati SinghCenter for Ocular Regeneration (CORE), Prof. Brien Holden Eye Research Centre (BHERC), L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India; Hariram Motumal Nasta and Renu Hariram Nasta Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery Services, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India; Prof. Krothapalli Ravindranath Ophthalmic Research Biorepository, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India. Electronic address: swatisingh@lvpei.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem/progenitor cells play an important role in tissue repair and regeneration in response to injury and maintain tissue homeostasis. The existence of the progenitor cells within the human lacrimal gland is established, but their distribution and response to tissue injury are unclear. This study investigated progenitor cells' distribution and gene expression in normal and inflamed human lacrimal glands. Biopsies from healthy human lacrimal glands (n = 9, 61 ± 14.3 years) and non-specific dacryoadenitis (n = 5; 42.8 ± 19.3 years) were immunostained with progenitor cell markers- Nestin, p63 alpha, CK15, ABCG2, c-kit, and CD90, along with RT-PCR. The basal cell layer of interlobular and intercalated ducts and periacinar spindle-shaped cells expressed progenitor markers. In the dacryoadenitis specimens, lacrimal gland injury was noted as moderate to severe diffuse inflammation and acinar atrophy. The average percentage of positive cells (in ten high-power fields) showed no significant change in dacryoadenitis specimens, except for an increase in CD90. Gene expression revealed a substantial increase in CD90 and reduced expression of ABCG2 and p63α in dacryoadenitis. Double immunostaining with CD73 and CD105 demonstrated predominant CD90 expression in the endothelial cells rather than in the periacinar or periductal regions. The human lacrimal gland has progenitor cells around the intercalated and interlobular ducts that do not increase in severe glandular inflammation. Inflamed lacrimal glands have a demonstrable increase in the expression of MSCs but a reduction in epithelial progenitor cells. Future studies on the interaction between immune and progenitor/stem cells within the lacrimal gland will clarify the mechanisms involved.

Indexed as

DacryocystitisEpithelial CellsLacrimal ApparatusMesenchymal Stem CellsAdultAgedBiomarkersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkersDacryoadenitisLacrimal glandNestinProgenitor cellsRegenerationStem cells

Identifiers

PMID40849005
PMCPMC7619047

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.