Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40849211›Full record

ArticleUrologic oncology2025

Renal surgery following HIF-2α antagonist therapy: Surgical indications, outcomes and growth kinetics.

Daniel Nethala, Braden Millan, Jason Hyman, Nityam Rathi, Jessica Hsueh, Christopher Koller, Charles Hesswani, Alexander P Kenigsberg, Neil Mendhiratta, Keith Lawson and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urologic oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Daniel NethalaCenter for Cancer Research, Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Braden MillanCenter for Cancer Research, Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Jason HymanCenter for Cancer Research, Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Nityam RathiCenter for Cancer Research, Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Jessica HsuehCenter for Cancer Research, Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Christopher KollerCenter for Cancer Research, Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Charles HesswaniCenter for Cancer Research, Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Alexander P KenigsbergCenter for Cancer Research, Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Neil MendhirattaCenter for Cancer Research, Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Keith LawsonCenter for Cancer Research, Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Matthew MillerCenter for Cancer Research, Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Sahil ParikhCenter for Cancer Research, Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
William AzarCenter for Cancer Research, Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Kyle SchuppeCenter for Cancer Research, Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Maria J MerinoLaboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Cathy D VockeCenter for Cancer Research, Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Christopher J RickettsCenter for Cancer Research, Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Ramaprasad SrinivasanCenter for Cancer Research, Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Sandeep GurramCenter for Cancer Research, Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
W Marston LinehanCenter for Cancer Research, Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Mark W BallCenter for Cancer Research, Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Electronic address: mark.ball@nih.gov.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development of HIF-2α antagonists marked an advancement in the treatment of localized VHL-deficient kidney cancer; however, their impact on subsequent surgical interventions remains unexplored. This study investigated the indications for and outcomes of patients undergoing renal surgery after exposure to HIF-2α antagonists and the growth rates (GR) of their index renal tumors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsWe performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent renal surgery at a single institution following or during treatment with a HIF-2α antagonist. Data regarding the clinicopathologic characteristics, therapy management, and surgical outcomes were collected. Index tumor GRs before, during and after drug administration were calculated and compared. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Twenty-seven patients underwent 28 surgeries after exposure to a HIF-2α antagonist from 2015 to 2023, with a total of 82 tumors removed. About 24 patients were treated with Belzutifan, and 3 patients were treated with PT2385, with 26 patients having a diagnosis of VHL syndrome. The median time on therapy prior to surgery was 14.7 months, with a median washout time of drug to surgery of 10 days. Median preoperative hemoglobin prior to surgery was 11.6 g/dL. Two blood transfusions were administered, 1 intraoperatively and 1 postoperatively. Seven postoperative complications were noted, 2 of which were ≥ Grade 3. The median index tumor GR prior to treatment was 0.37 cm/y, 0.46 cm/y during treatment, and 0.54 cm/y post-treatment. There was no significant difference in GRs between the groups. Median time to restart HIF-2α antagonist after surgery was 43 days. Limitations of this study include retrospective nature, single center, and lack of control group.

conclusionsRenal surgery after or during exposure to a HIF-2α antagonist is safe and feasible, with rates of both transfusions and complications commensurate with the reported literature from standard renal surgery. GRs of index renal tumors that eventually needed surgical intervention did not show a significant difference before, during, and after therapy. Tumors exhibiting a positive GR on drug may represent the indication that drives early surgical intervention prior to the tumor reaching the 3 cm threshold. A median washout time of 10 days from last dose of HIF-2α antagonist to surgery was safe and well tolerated.

Indexed as

Basic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCarcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsNephrectomyAdultAgedEndothelial PAS Domain-Containing Protein 1FemaleHumansIndansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSulfonesTreatment OutcomeBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsEndothelial PAS Domain-Containing Protein 1IndansPT2385SulfonesKidney cancerRenal cell carcinomaSystemic therapyTumor growthVon Hippel-Lindau

Identifiers

PMID40849211
PMCPMC12486230

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.