ArticleUrologic oncology2025
Renal surgery following HIF-2α antagonist therapy: Surgical indications, outcomes and growth kinetics.
Article in Urologic oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe development of HIF-2α antagonists marked an advancement in the treatment of localized VHL-deficient kidney cancer; however, their impact on subsequent surgical interventions remains unexplored. This study investigated the indications for and outcomes of patients undergoing renal surgery after exposure to HIF-2α antagonists and the growth rates (GR) of their index renal tumors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsWe performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent renal surgery at a single institution following or during treatment with a HIF-2α antagonist. Data regarding the clinicopathologic characteristics, therapy management, and surgical outcomes were collected. Index tumor GRs before, during and after drug administration were calculated and compared. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Twenty-seven patients underwent 28 surgeries after exposure to a HIF-2α antagonist from 2015 to 2023, with a total of 82 tumors removed. About 24 patients were treated with Belzutifan, and 3 patients were treated with PT2385, with 26 patients having a diagnosis of VHL syndrome. The median time on therapy prior to surgery was 14.7 months, with a median washout time of drug to surgery of 10 days. Median preoperative hemoglobin prior to surgery was 11.6 g/dL. Two blood transfusions were administered, 1 intraoperatively and 1 postoperatively. Seven postoperative complications were noted, 2 of which were ≥ Grade 3. The median index tumor GR prior to treatment was 0.37 cm/y, 0.46 cm/y during treatment, and 0.54 cm/y post-treatment. There was no significant difference in GRs between the groups. Median time to restart HIF-2α antagonist after surgery was 43 days. Limitations of this study include retrospective nature, single center, and lack of control group.
conclusionsRenal surgery after or during exposure to a HIF-2α antagonist is safe and feasible, with rates of both transfusions and complications commensurate with the reported literature from standard renal surgery. GRs of index renal tumors that eventually needed surgical intervention did not show a significant difference before, during, and after therapy. Tumors exhibiting a positive GR on drug may represent the indication that drives early surgical intervention prior to the tumor reaching the 3 cm threshold. A median washout time of 10 days from last dose of HIF-2α antagonist to surgery was safe and well tolerated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.