ArticleScientific reports2025
Potential application of Healitide-GP1, a novel antibacterial peptide, in wound healing: in vitro studies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mollusk-Derived Peptides at the Food-Pharma Interface: Bioactivities, Preclinical Evidence, and Development Prospects.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wound healing is a complex process that can be compromised by bacterial infections, leading to delayed healing and an increased risk of complications. The aim of this study was to design and develop a novel antibacterial peptide, Healitide-GP1, which could be used in the treatment of infected wounds. A machine learning-based approach was used to identify the key features of WHPs and a genetic algorithm was used to generate new peptide sequences. Healitide-GP1 was synthesized and functionally validated. It showed high cytocompatibility (> 200 µg/mL in human dermal fibroblasts (HDF) and human keratinocytes (HaCaT)), improved wound closure (48% and 52% after 24 h, respectively) and strong antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus (MIC: 12.5 µg/mL) and Escherichia coli (MIC: 25 µg/mL). Bioinformatics analyses revealed the unique hydrophobic motif and distinct evolutionary positioning of Healitide-GP1, suggesting a novel mechanism of action. These results emphasize the potential of Healitide-GP1 as a promising therapeutic candidate for the treatment of infected wounds. Our study demonstrates the successful integration of machine learning, bioinformatics and experimental validation in the development of therapeutic peptides and provides a valuable framework for the discovery of novel treatments for wound infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.