ArticleMolecular psychiatry2026
A study of gene expression in the living human brain.
Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying independent causal cell types for human diseases and risk variants.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- Lewy pathology largely absent in prefrontal cortices of Parkinson's disease patients undergoing deep brain stimulation.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- Cross-generational transcriptomic effects of alcohol use disorder in third generation offspring.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cortical morphometric inverse divergence in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder correlates with cell-type-specific, laminar-specific and developmental transcriptomic signatures.Psychological medicine · 2026Article
- A transcriptional program associated with neurotransmission in the living human brain.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- A Community Standard Multispecies Cell Atlas of the Basal Ganglia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Region-resolved proteomic map of the human brain: functional interconnections and neurological implications.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Article
- Article
- Live-cell physiology in human brain tissue culture-the potential, the challenges, and the lessons learned.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Review
- Genetic Foundations of Inter-individual Neurophysiological Variability.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Codes between Poles: Linking Transcriptomic Insights into the Neurobiology of Bipolar Disorder.Biology · 2024Article
- Regional patterns of human cortex development correlate with underlying neurobiology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Divergent landscapes of A-to-I editing in postmortem and living human brain.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Single-cell genomics and regulatory networks for 388 human brains.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Divergent landscapes of A-to-I editing in postmortem and living human brain.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Single-cell genomics and regulatory networks for 388 human brains.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- General and specific patterns of cortical gene expression as spatial correlates of complex cognitive functioning.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Cell-type deconvolution of bulk-blood RNA-seq reveals biological insights into neuropsychiatric disorders.American journal of human genetics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A goal of psychiatric research is to determine the molecular basis of human brain health and illness. One way to achieve this goal is through studies of gene expression in human brain tissue. Due to the unavailability of brain tissue from living people, most such studies are performed using tissue from postmortem brain donors. An assumption underlying this practice is that gene expression in the postmortem human brain is an accurate representation of gene expression in the living human brain. This assumption - which, until now, had not been adequately tested - was tested by comparing human prefrontal cortex gene expression between 275 living samples and 243 postmortem samples. Expression levels differed significantly for nearly 80% of genes, and a systematic examination of alternative explanations for this observation determined that these differences are not explained by cell type composition, RNA quality, postmortem interval, age, medication, morbidity, symptom severity, tissue pathology, sample handling, batch effects, or computational methods utilized. Using gene expression data from two independent cohorts, the differences identified between living and postmortem samples were replicated and shown to be present in all brain cell types. Analyses integrating the data generated for this study with data from earlier studies that used tissue from postmortem brain donors showed that postmortem brain gene expression signatures of psychiatric and neurological illnesses, as well as of normal traits such as aging, may not always be accurate representations of these gene expression signatures in the living brain. By using tissue safely obtained from large cohorts of living people, future studies of the human brain have the potential to (1) determine the biomedical research questions that can be addressed using postmortem tissue as a proxy for living tissue and (2) expand the scope of medical research to include questions about the molecular basis of human brain health and illness that can only be addressed in living people (e.g., "What happens in the brain at the molecular level as a person experiences an emotion?").
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.