ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2025
Antiproliferative Potential of Linagliptin-Rivaroxaban Mixture in Cervical Cancer: Mechanistic Insights into Targeting Mutant MAPK, RAS kinase Signal Protein.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Protective Role of Linagliptin in Cisplatin-Mediated Liver Injury: Involvement of STAT3 and AMPK/SIRT1/PGC-1alpha Mitochondrial Energy Sensing Networks.Advances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRepositioning existing marketed drugs represents a viable strategy for identifying new anticancer agents. This study employed an approach that combined these drugs and examined their molecular mechanisms of action against cancer.
objectiveThis study evaluated the anticancer properties of the linagliptin-rivaroxaban mixture and its molecular anticancer mechanism by screening its ability to target the mutant MAPK-RAS kinase signal proteins.
methodsFollowing 24 and 72 hours of incubation, HeLa and human-derived adipose tissue (NHF) cell lines were utilized to investigate the anticancer and safety properties of a linagliptin-rivaroxaban mixture and cisplatin at concentrations between 0.1 and 1,000 µg/ml. A combination and selectivity index study assessed the potential synergistic effects between mixture ingredients and selective toxicity. Computational molecular docking simulations were employed to investigate the binding affinity of linagliptin and rivaroxaban to various mutant kinase signal proteins within the MAPK-RAS kinase pathway.
resultsThe study results indicated that the combination of linagliptin and rivaroxaban significantly suppressed the growth of cervical cancer cells compared to the inhibitory effects of cisplatin, linagliptin, and rivaroxaban individually. Furthermore, the mixture cytotoxicity on the NHF cell line was significantly lower than that of cisplatin. The interaction between linagliptin and rivaroxaban exhibited synergistic cytotoxicity, as evidenced by the combination index score. The mixture exhibited selective cytotoxicity against cancer cells, suggesting a favorable toxicity index score. The outcomes of the molecular docking pilot study of diverse mutant MAPK-RAS kinase signal proteins with the mixture's ingredients are indicated. Linagliptin and rivaroxaban's best interactions were with mutant P38 MAPK and RAS kinase signal proteins, with docking scores of -7.9 kcal/mol and -8.7 kcal/mol, respectively.
conclusionRegarding the study findings and the established pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of mixture drugs. The linagliptin-rivaroxaban mixture offers an attractive and safer alternative for cervical cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.