Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40850049›Full record

ReviewDNA repair2025

Insight into meiotic DNA end resection: Mechanisms and regulation.

Soonjoung Kim, Hasan F Alnaser, Scott Keeney, Hajime Murakami

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in DNA repair, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mechanisms That Govern Recombinase Fidelity Control During Eukaryotic Homologous Recombination.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Soonjoung KimMolecular Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute for Immunology and Immunological Diseases, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea. Electronic address: soonjk@yuhs.ac.
Hasan F AlnaserChromosome and Cellular Dynamics Section, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK.
Scott KeeneyMolecular Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Hajime MurakamiMolecular Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Chromosome and Cellular Dynamics Section, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK. Electronic address: hajime.murakami1@abdn.ac.uk.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Mechanism and regulation of meiotic recombinationR35GM118092 · NIGMS · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Scott Keeney · 2016 to 2026
$7.0M
Structural and functional principles underlying germline genome transmissionR01HD110120 · NICHD · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Scott Keeney, DINSHAW J PATEL · 2022 to 2026
$2.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD110120NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meiosis generates reproductive cells with a reduced genome complement, with most species using homologous recombination to promote accurate meiotic chromosome segregation and to generate genetic diversity among offspring. A critical step in homologous recombination is DNA end resection, in which DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are processed by nucleases to yield the 3' single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) needed for homology search and strand invasion. DSB resection in nonmeiotic contexts has been extensively studied, but meiotic resection is less well understood. We provide here a review of studies elucidating the mechanism and regulation of resection during meiosis, covering similarities and differences from resection in mitotically dividing cells. The nucleases that carry out resection are discussed, along with resection-modulating factors such as DNA damage signaling and chromatin structure. We focus on the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and on mouse, for which the most information is currently available, but also describe studies in other species that point to evolutionary conservation or divergence in this key process needed for genome integrity in the germline.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedMeiosisAnimalsDNA RepairDNA, Single-StrandedHumansMiceSaccharomyces cerevisiaeDNA, Single-StrandedDNA double-strand break resectionExo1MeiosisMre11Nbs1Rad50Xrs2

Identifiers

PMID40850049
PMCPMC12453631

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.