ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2025
Causal association between different types of ametropia and risk of diabetic retinopathy: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.
Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the causal link between ametropia and diabetic retinopathy, as well as to offer genetic support for the association between these two conditions.
methodsThis study employed a methodology involving the utilisation of genome-wide association studies data that are publicly accessible. Specifically, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that exhibit a strong association with ametropia were employed as instrumental variables, and a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach was employed to examine the causal relationship between different types of ametropia and diabetic retinopathy. The main findings were derived from the utilisation of inverse variance weighted (IVW), while supplementary results were obtained through the utilisation of MR Egger, weighted median, simple mode and weighted mode. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was conducted using the 'leave-one-out' method. Cochran's Q statistics were also used to quantify the heterogeneity of SNPs.
results38 SNPs were finally included. The results of the IVW analysis indicate that myopia may exert an inhibitory effect on the development of diabetic retinopathy (OR=0.596, 95% CI (0.371, 0.957), p<0.05). Conversely, hypermetropia (OR=8.882, 95% CI (0.389×10
conclusionThis two-sample Mendelian randomization study provides evidence that myopia may impede diabetic retinopathy occurrence, while hypermetropia and astigmatism show no significant causal effects. However, our analysis treats refractive errors as independent entities, which may not reflect their clinical interdependence. Further investigations are warranted to elucidate myopia's protective mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.