Evidence mapPaperPMID 40850996Full record

SynthesisOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2025

Increased fall risk in people with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aksayan Arunanthy Mahalingasivam, Peter Vestergaard, Nicklas Højgaard-Hessellund Rasmussen

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aksayan Arunanthy MahalingasivamSteno Diabetes Centre North Denmark, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. aksayan.mahalingasivam@rn.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0406-9702
Peter VestergaardSteno Diabetes Centre North Denmark, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Nicklas Højgaard-Hessellund RasmussenSteno Diabetes Centre North Denmark, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.

Funding

DDEA research grant NNF22SA0079901Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF18OC0052064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have an increased risk of falls, a concern further complicated by cardiovascular disease (CVD). Falls pose significant risks of morbidity and mortality, yet the interplay between T2D, CVD, and fall risk remains insufficiently understood. This study aimed to systematically assess the current evidence and estimate the risk of falls in people with coexisting T2D and CVD. A systematic literature search and a meta-analysis were conducted utilizing PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane using PRISMA guidelines. Studies assessing fall risk in people with T2D, with or without CVD, were included. Quality assessment was performed using validated tools such as JADAD, NOS, and GRADE. Existing literature indicates that people with T2D and coexisting CVD have a significantly higher risk of falls compared to those with T2D without CVD. This association was confirmed by the meta-analysis, which demonstrated a pooled odds ratio of 1.29 (95% CI 1.03-1.63). However, clear associations between specific cardiovascular outcomes-such as hypertension, orthostatic hypotension, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and ischemic disease-and fall risk remained inconclusive. Some studies indicated that autonomic dysfunction, postural instability, and blood pressure dysregulation contributed to fall risk, but findings were inconsistent. The heterogeneity in study methodologies, outcome measures, and sample populations limits definitive conclusions. This review and meta-analysis found an increased fall risk in people with T2D and coexisting CVD; however, current evidence remains insufficient to establish a definitive causal relationship between CVD and fall risk, despite the observed higher fall prevalence.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsBalanceCardiovascular diseaseDiabetes mellitus type 2FallReview

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.