ArticleScientific reports2025
Prospectively assessed hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction after proton therapy in adults with head and neck, skull base and brain tumors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pituitary Society Delphi consensus on the role of radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas.Pituitary · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiotherapy is advocated for many brain and head and neck tumors close to the pituitary gland. Pituitary hormones govern many vital functions but data of standardized monitoring for deficiencies after irradiation are lacking. We prospectively assessed the latency and frequency of hypothalamo-pituitary radiation dose-effects in patients undergoing proton therapy or mixed photon /proton beams for CNS, skull base and head and neck tumors. Radiation oncologists prospectively were asked to monitor endocrine functions based on a standardized protocol complying with international recommendations at 6, 12 months and yearly during follow-up. Patient, tumor and treatment characteristics were collected. Seventy patients (women 70%, median age 60.1 years) had undergone endocrine monitoring with a median follow-up of 20.7 (12.8-29.5) months. Thirty percent of patients had at least one pituitary deficiency before radiotherapy. Median mean dose to the pituitary gland and hypothalamus were respectively 52.0 (50.4-53.9) Gy and 24.7 (16.8-39.2) Gy. Of these patients with heavily exposed on their pituitary gland, skull base meningiomas (47.1%) and pituitary adenomas were the most represented (28.7%). Twenty-six (37.1%) patients experienced a new pituitary deficiency after a median time of 14.1 [IQR 10.3-23.6] months. Lactotroph and gonadotroph axis deficiencies occurred in 36% and 23.2% of the patients after 13.5 and 24.5 months, respectively. GH deficiency occurred in 9.7% patients after 27.1 months. TSH and ACTH axes occurred in 7.8% and 6.3% of patients after 21.8 and 19.0 months. On univariate analysis, only BMI < 25 was significantly associated with a shorter time to new deficiency onset. In this selected population of patients receiving over 50 Gy RBE to the pituitary gland, patients frequently developed at least one new pituitary deficiency within 2 years. As hormonal deficiencies are frequent after surgery and radiotherapy have functional and quality-of-life consequences and can be substituted medically, baseline and routine annual monitoring of every axis were performed. Educational programs for patients and physicians toward more systematic monitoring in patients, including those receiving < 30 Gy could serve to analyze radiation dose-effects and better predict individual endocrine normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.