ReviewEpigenomics2025
Epigenetic synthetic lethality as a cancer therapeutic strategy: synergy of experimental and computational approaches.
Review in Epigenomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer treatment is an ongoing challenge, as directly targeting oncogenic drivers is often unfeasible in many patients due to the lack of druggable targets. This has led to the exploration of alternative strategies, such as exploiting synthetic lethality (SL) relationships between genes. SL facilitates the indirect targeting of oncogenic drivers, as exemplified by the clinical success of PARP inhibitors against BRCA-mutated tumors. Advances in high-throughput perturbation screens and multi-omics technologies have deepened our understanding of SL relationships, while computational models enhance SL predictions to better reflect biological complexity. However, while numerous experimental and computational methods have been developed to identify SL interactions, difficulties remain in translating these findings into clinical applications.This review combines recent progress on SL relationships in cancer with emerging insights into epigenetic regulation, highlighting how epigenetic drugs (epidrugs) can provide new opportunities for targeted interventions, offering a way to minimize off-target effects and enhance therapeutic precision. To advance SL-based therapies, efforts must focus not only on identifying new SL interactions but also on consolidating existing knowledge and integrating experimental and computational approaches to characterize the vulnerabilities of cancer cells. Strengthening this foundation will be critical for the effective development of SL-based cancer treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.