Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40851543›Full record

SynthesisJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2026

Research Review: On the (mis)use of puberty data in the ABCD Study® - a systematic review, problem illustration, and path forward.

Adriene M Beltz, Holly Pham, Tristin Smith, Esmeralda Hidalgo-Lopez, Hannah Becker, Christel M Portengen, Mary M Heitzeg, Chelsea Kaplan, Sheri A Berenbaum

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Adriene M BeltzDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5754-8083
Holly PhamDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Tristin SmithDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Esmeralda Hidalgo-LopezDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Hannah BeckerDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Christel M PortengenDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Mary M HeitzegDepartment of Psychiatry, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Chelsea KaplanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Sheri A BerenbaumDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

Funding

ABCD-USA Consortium: Coordinating CenterU24DA041147 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SANDRA A BROWN, TERRY L. JERNIGAN · 2015 to 2026
$54.7M
ABCD-USA Consortium: Data Analysis, Informatics and Resource CenterU24DA041123 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ANDERS M DALE · 2015 to 2026
$51.5M
Adolescent Substance Use Initiation: Disentangling neurocognitive risks from consequences using longitudinal and genetically-informed methodsU01DA041120 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Monica Luciana, Sylia Wilson · 2015 to 2026
$34.5M
ABCD-USA Consortium: Research ProjectU01DA041089 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Joanna Jacobus, Susan F. Tapert · 2015 to 2026
$31.7M
Prospective Research Studies of Maturation (PRISM)- Research ProjectU01DA041134 · NIDA · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ERIN MCGLADE, PERRY FRANKLIN RENSHAW · 2015 to 2026
$29.2M
ABCD-USA CONSORTIUM: RESEARCH PROJECTU01DA041048 · NIDA · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES · PI Megan Marie Herting, ELIZABETH R SOWELL · 2015 to 2026
$28.7M
ABCD-USA Consortium: Research ProjectU01DA041106 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Mary M Heitzeg, Chandra Sekhar Sripada · 2015 to 2026
$24.9M
FIU-ABCD: Pathways and Mechanisms to Addiction in the Latino Youth of South FloridaU01DA041156 · NIDA · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI Raul Gonzalez, Angela R Laird · 2015 to 2026
$22.8M
ABCD-USA Consortium: Research ProjectU01DA041148 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Damien A Fair, Rebekah S Huber · 2015 to 2026
$22.3M
ABCD-USA: NYC Research ProjectU01DA041174 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Arielle Ryan Baskin-Sommers, Betty J Casey · 2015 to 2026
$19.7M
Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Prospective Research in Studies of Maturation (PRISM) ConsortiumU01DA041117 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI LINDA CHANG, THOMAS M ERNST · 2015 to 2026
$19.5M
ABCD-USA Consortium:Research ProjectU01DA041028 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DUNCAN B. CLARK, BEATRIZ LUNA · 2015 to 2026
$13.9M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA017629NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041022NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041028NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041048NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041089NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041106NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041117NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041120NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041134NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041148NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041156NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041174NIDA NIH HHS U24 DA041123NIDA NIH HHS U24 DA041147NINR NIH HHS R01 NR020013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development

methodsFirst, we conducted a review of published studies using ABCD puberty data through December 2024, following PRISMA guidelines. Two independent raters coded the studies for key features. Second, we used data from ABCD baseline and the Year 1 follow-up to empirically compare the categorical and continuous measures in descriptives, reliability, sex differences, twin similarities, and examine correspondence.

resultsSystematic review results from 190 reports showed that more studies considered puberty as a covariate (72%) than a variable of interest (28%), with 44% using the categorical measure from data releases and another 28% providing insufficient information to determine measurement. When puberty was a focus, there was variability in the use of youth versus parent-report and approach to missing data, and little attention to sex differences. Results from the empirical comparison showed advantages of the continuous over the categorical measure in data availability, developmental distributions, and reliability; they also confirmed the limited utility of youth-report in early puberty.

conclusionsResults have crucial implications for the use of ABCD puberty data, especially early assessments. They highlight the complexity of studying pubertal influences on adolescent development and emphasize measurement. Attention to these issues will maximize the potential of ABCD to rigorously delineate the role of puberty in brain and behavioral development and to ultimately promote youth well-being.

Indexed as

Adolescent DevelopmentPubertyAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleAdolescenceAdolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study®measurementPubertal Development Scalepubertal statussex differencessystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40851543
PMCPMC12699133

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.