Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40852089›Full record

ReviewAdvanced intelligent systems (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2025

Toward Autonomous Self-Healing in Soft Robotics: A Review and Perspective for Future Research.

Seyedreza Kashef Tabrizian, Seppe Terryn, Bram Vanderborght

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced intelligent systems (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Seyedreza Kashef TabrizianBrubotics Vrije Universiteit Brussel and imec 1050 Brussels Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7296-4966
Seppe TerrynBrubotics Vrije Universiteit Brussel and imec 1050 Brussels Belgium.
Bram VanderborghtBrubotics Vrije Universiteit Brussel and imec 1050 Brussels Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in dynamic and reversible polymer networks have led to self-healing soft robots that can restore their physical and electrical properties after damage. However, in most cases, human intervention remains essential for the healing process. This poses a challenge, especially in working environments with limited human access or where human involvement cand hinder efficiency. To address this gap, in this article, first, the different phases of the healing process in soft robotics are discussed and then the technologies that are or can be integrated into self-healing soft robots to allow each individual phase to be performed autonomously with minimal human involvement are reviewed. Finally, in this article, the challenges of integrating all phases into self-healing soft robots are discussed and the perspectives on achieving fully autonomous self-healing in the future are offered. These phases are classified into five: damage detection, damage cleaning, damage closure, stimulus-triggered material healing, and recovery assessment. Achieving these attributes requires employing physical intelligence at the material level through the use of stimuli-responsive materials or utilizing embodied intelligence at the system level by integrating healing-assistive subsystems or a synergistic combination of both. Consequently, self-healing soft robots can achieve self-sufficiency in their healing capabilities, rendering them a sustainable solution for broader applications.

Indexed as

autonomous healingsdamage closuresdamage sensorsself‐healingssoft robotics

Identifiers

PMID40852089
PMCPMC12370171

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.