Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40852187›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025

Development and validation of an explainable machine learning model for predicting osteoporosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Qipeng Wei, Zihao Liu, Xiaofeng Chen, Hao Li, Weijun Guo, Qingyan Huang, Jinxiang Zhan, Shiji Chen, Dongling Cai

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Qipeng WeiDepartment of Orthopedics, Panyu Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Zihao LiuPanyu Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaofeng ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, Panyu Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Hao LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Panyu Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Weijun GuoDepartment of Orthopedics, Panyu Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Qingyan HuangDepartment of Orthopedics, Panyu Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jinxiang ZhanDepartment of Orthopedics, Panyu Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Shiji ChenPanyu Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Dongling CaiDepartment of Orthopedics, Panyu Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Osteoporosis is a common complication in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), yet its screening rate remains low. This study aimed to develop and validate a cost-effective and interpretable machine learning (ML) model to predict the risk of osteoporosis in patients with T2DM. Methods: This retrospective study included 1560 inpatients who underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) between January 2022 and December 2023 at Panyu Hospital of Chinese Medicine. Demographic information and laboratory test results obtained within 24 hours of hospital admission were collected. Potential predictive features were identified using univariate analysis, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, and the Boruta algorithm. Eight supervised ML algorithms were applied to construct predictive models. Model performance was evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, decision curve analysis (DCA), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to interpret the model and visualize feature importance. Results: Ten predictive features were selected based on the intersection of the three feature selection methods. Among the tested models, logistic regression achieved the best overall performance, with an AUC of 0.812, an accuracy of 0.762, a sensitivity of 0.809, a specificity of 0.761, and an F1 score of 0.771 in the validation set. Calibration plots and DCA curves demonstrated good agreement and the highest net clinical benefit. SHAP analysis identified age, sex, alkaline phosphatase, uric acid, hemoglobin, and neutrophil count as the six most influential features. An easy-to-use, web-based risk calculator was developed based on the logistic model and is available at: https://t2dm.shinyapps.io/t2dm-osteoporosis/. Conclusion: We developed an interpretable and accessible ML-based online tool that enables preliminary screening of osteoporosis risk in patients with T2DM using routine blood indicators. This tool may assist clinicians in early risk identification and reduce the underdiagnosis of osteoporosis.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Machine LearningOsteoporosisAbsorptiometry, PhotonAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsROC Curveexplainable machine learningosteoporosispredictive modelrisk assessmenttype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID40852187
PMCPMC12367474

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.