ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2025
Mechanical Axis Deviation Angle Versus Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Correlation and Reliability.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the Mechanical Axis Deviation Angle (MAD-A) and Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (HKA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and to compare their inter-observer reliability. Methods: MAD-A and HKA measurements were obtained for 108 consecutive knees (57 patients, age, 63.0 ± 4.2 years) undergoing primary TKA from February 2018 to February 2019. Measurements were taken preoperatively and 6 weeks postoperatively using long-leg radiograph, and 3 days postoperatively using CT scanogram. MAD-A was measured as the angle between the femoral mechanical axis (line from the center of the femoral head to the center of the knee) and the overall limb mechanical axis (line from the center of the femoral head to the center of the ankle). This angle specifically quantified the angular deviation of the femoral mechanical axis from the ideal limb mechanical axis. Three independent observers performed measurements for reliability testing. Results: Bland-Altman analysis revealed consistent differences between measurements, with MAD-A demonstrating lower values compared to HKA (mean differences - 1.4° to - 6.2°), representing approximately 43-54% of HKA values. MAD-A and HKA showed strong positive correlations at all time-points ( Conclusion: MAD-A demonstrated strong correlation with HKA and superior inter-observer reliability in assessing coronal alignment in TKA. These findings suggest that MAD-A could serve as a complementary tool to HKA in alignment assessment. Further research is needed to establish normative values across knee pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.