Observational studyAnnals of neurology2026
Persisting Transglutaminase 6 Antibodies in Neurological Gluten-Related Disorders.
Observational study in Annals of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Psychiatric Symptoms Associated with Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity: A Focused Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Review
- Detection of Diagnostic Antibodies in Immune-Mediated Diseases: A Focus on Antigens and Technologies.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026Review
- Human Transglutaminases: Updated Insights into Activation Mechanisms, Allosteric Regulation and Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Factors Affecting Gluten-Free Dietary Adherence in Patients with Neurological Gluten-Related Disease.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Celiac disease as a model of gut-brain autoimmunity: from gluten exposure to neuropsychiatric manifestations.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveGluten-related autoimmunity can cause neurological disease, although the best way to diagnose and monitor such patients is unclear. Serological testing for antibodies against transglutaminase 6 (TG6) has been proposed; however, this is not widely available in clinical practice. Using longitudinal data from patients attending a specialist neurological center with routine TG6 testing, this observational study explores how antibody history relates to brain atrophy, cognition, and quality of life.
methodsSerological records of patients with gluten-related neurological disease were collected alongside clinical brain magnetic resonance imaging. Patients were recruited to undertake questionnaires that assessed/included chronic symptom severity, the hospital anxiety and depression scale, the SF-12, and the Biagi scale for gluten-free diet adherence. Volunteers were offered the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome scale for cognitive testing. Primary analyses focused on patients with ≥5 years of serology (n = 462), and related TG6 history to available clinical outcomes (primary analysis range 89-104).
resultsPatients with a previous positive immunoglobulin A (IgA) TG6 result reported greater depression, symptom severity, and poorer physical functioning. IgA TG6 antibody exposure was correlated with regional brain atrophy (age-corrected). Greater self-reported gluten-free diet adherence significantly predicted a recent negative IgA TG6 test. Subgroup analyses replicated multiple findings in patients with and without celiac disease.
interpretationTG6 testing can identify patients at risk of accelerated brain atrophy, poorer physical functioning, and worsened mental health. IgA TG6 should be used as a diagnostic and monitoring test for patients with relevant neurological presentations, while achieving negative serology with a strict gluten-free diet should be the goal. ANN NEUROL 2026;99:274-282.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.