ArticleScience progress
Interpretable machine learning model for predicting myocardial injury in intensive care unit patients using SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis.
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveThe identification of myocardial injury in the intensive care unit (ICU) has received little attention from researchers. Therefore, this retrospective cohort study aimed to develop a machine-learning model to predict the occurrence of myocardial injury in the ICU.MethodsBased on the Clinical Research Data Platform of Peking University People's Hospital, we enrolled adult, non-cardiac surgical, and non-obstetric patients who were admitted to the ICU between 2012 and 2022. Logistic regression, random forest, LASSO regression, support vector machine and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models were developed to predict myocardial injury.ResultsData from 7453 non-cardiac surgery adult patients in ICU were collected in the derivation cohort (myocardial injury group: 2161 [29%], non-myocardial injury group: 5292 [71%]). Among the five models, the XGBoost model (area under the curve = 0.779; accuracy = 0.781) exhibited the best predictive performance for myocardial injury and the results were explained by the SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis. The top six features of the XGBoost model were maximal heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature, minimal heart rate, age and plasma transfusion.ConclusionThis machine-learning model, developed using the XGBoost algorithm, could be a valuable tool for clinical decision-making and detecting myocardial injury in the ICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.