ReviewEpilepsia open2025
AI-based localization of the epileptogenic zone using intracranial EEG.
Review in Epilepsia open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of machine learning approaches to predict seizure-onset zones in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: a systematic review.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Predicting surgical outcome in drug-resistant epilepsy by combining interictal biomarkers within a machine learning framework.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- AI enabled decision support systems in epilepsy surgery a scoping review.Research square · 2026Article
- Predicting Surgical Outcome in Drug-Resistant Epilepsy by Combining Interictal Biomarkers within a Machine Learning Framework.Research square · 2026Article
- Deep learning enabled decision support systems in epilepsy surgery: a scoping review.npj health systems · 2026Article
- PyHFO 2.0: an open-source platform for deep learning-based clinical high-frequency oscillations analysis.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming our lives. Machine learning (ML) enables computers to learn from data and make decisions without explicit instructions. Deep learning (DL), a subset of ML, uses multiple layers of neural networks to recognize complex patterns in large datasets through end-to-end learning. DL has achieved remarkable success in challenging tasks such as facial recognition, self-driving cars, and chatbots utilizing natural language processing. This progress extends to clinical practice and research in epilepsy. In this review, we provide an overview of AI applications in one of the most challenging yet crucial tasks in epilepsy: delineating the epileptogenic zone (EZ) using intracranial EEG. We discuss recent ML and DL real-world workflows in EEG analysis, including preprocessing, training, evaluation, and interpretation. Then, we provide an overview of AI-based approaches for EZ identification using interictal EEG, with a particular focus on high-frequency oscillations. Lastly, we address the considerations and challenges that must be overcome to maximize the potential of AI-based algorithms in EZ identification and biomarker discovery. We hope this review will foster discussions within the community on how to leverage AI to advance research and improve clinical practices in epilepsy. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: AI has the potential to revolutionize epilepsy care by enhancing how clinicians pinpoint the brain regions responsible for seizures. This article highlights how AI can analyze interictal EEG (recorded between seizures) to detect subtle brain signals linked to epilepsy and to accurately define the epileptogenic zone. The AI-based approach may lead to quicker diagnoses, more personalized treatments, and better surgical outcomes for patients with epilepsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.