ArticleMolecular psychiatry2026
Next-generation precision medicine for pain.
Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sexually Dimorphic Neuroimmune Pathways in Chronic Pain: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms.Biomolecules · 2026Pooled it
- Next-generation precision medicine for mood disorders: reproducible blood biomarkers enable objective diagnostics, subtyping, and targeted therapeutics.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Repurposed Systemic Pharmacologic Agents in Chronic Pain: Emerging Mechanistic and Clinical Insights.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- New insight into RNA biomarkers in neuropathic pain: a clinician-neuroscientist roadmap to translational testing and treatment monitoring a clinical review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Global trends and hotspots of artificial intelligence in pain management: A bibliometric analysis.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic pain remains a massive problem in society in general, and in mental health patients in particular, being strongly bi-directionally connected to mental health. Lack of widespread use of objective information has hampered treatment and prevention efforts. Pain is a spectrum of severity, from transient vague discomfort to chronic excruciating incapacitation. Blood biomarkers that track pain severity can provide a window into the biology of pain, as well as could help with assessment and treatment. A previous study by us was positive. Here we describe new studies we conducted trans-diagnostically in psychiatric patients, starting with the whole genome, to expand the identification, prioritization, validation and testing of blood gene expression biomarkers for pain. We carried out two separate studies, on two different platforms, microarrays and RNA sequencing, using for each study a multiple independent cohorts design. This ensured biological and technical reproducibility. We then focused at the end on biomarkers that were convergent and reproducible between the two studies. We found new as well as previously known biomarkers that were predictive of high pain states, and of future emergency department visits related to them, using cross-sectional and longitudinal approaches. Using a polyevidence score, the overall top decreased in expression biomarker ("pain-suppressor gene") was CD55, a gene that suppresses the complement cascade and cell damage. The top increased biomarker ("algogene") was ANXA1, a gene that is an effector of glucocorticoid-mediated responses and regulator of the inflammatory processes. The top biological pathways were related to cellular response to TNF and to neuroinflammation. The top upstream regulator was TNF. Top therapeutic matches overall were the medications lithium and ketamine, as well as the nutraceuticals omega-3 fatty acids and magnesium. Drug repurposing bioinformatic analyses also identified the potential of carvedilol, sirolimus, budesonide, berbamine, and quetiapine, as well as of medications already used to treat pain such as amyleine, sulindac, sufentanil, carbamazepine, and meclofenamic acid, that serve as de facto positive controls. Additionally, we show how personalized patient reports for doctors would look like based on blood biomarkers testing, to aid with objective assessment of severity and risk, as well with individualized matching to medications and nutraceuticals. Given the fact that pain disorders are highly prevalent, can severely affect quality of life, and even lifespan, there is an urgent need for insights and tools such as the ones we have developed to be applied to and improve clinical diagnosis, treatment, and prevention options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.