ArticleNature communications2025
Probiotic acoustic biosensors for noninvasive imaging of gut inflammation.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of synthetic biology in biomedicine.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Microbial neuroscience: The gut microbiota as a cognitive layer.Trends open · 2026Review
- Global Probiotic Markets Meet Synthetic Biology: Translational Challenges andMicroorganisms · 2026Review
- Real-time volumetric imaging of cells and molecules in deep tissues with Takoyaki ultrasound.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Review
- Protein engineering: status report.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2026Review
- groovDB in 2026: a community-editable database of small molecule biosensors.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Biomarker Quantification of Gut Dysbiosis-Derived Inflammation: A Review.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) affect millions of people globally, result in severe symptoms, and are difficult to diagnose and monitor - often necessitating the use of invasive and costly methods such as colonoscopies or endoscopies. Engineered gut bacteria offer a promising alternative due to their ability to persist in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and sense and respond to specific environmental signals. However, probiotics that have previously been engineered to report on inflammatory and other disease biomarkers in the Gl tract rely on fluorescent or bioluminescent reporters, whose signals cannot be resolved in situ due to the poor penetration of light in tissue, or on colorimetric reporters which rely on plating feces. To overcome this limitation, we introduce probiotic biosensors that can be imaged in situ using ultrasound - a widely available, inexpensive imaging modality providing sub-mm spatial resolution deep inside the body. These biosensors are based on the clinically approved probiotic bacterium E. coli Nissle, which we engineered to transiently colonize the GI tract, sense inflammatory biomarkers, and respond by expressing air-filled sound-scattering protein nanostructures called gas vesicles. After optimizing biomolecular signaling circuits to respond sensitively to the biomarkers thiosulfate and tetrathionate and produce strong and stable ultrasound contrast, we validated our living biosensors in vivo by noninvasively imaging antibiotic-induced inflammation in mice. By connecting cell-based diagnostic agents to ultrasound, these probiotic biosensors will potentially make it easier and cheaper to diagnose and monitor IBD or other GI conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.