Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40855112›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

ACLPred: an explainable machine learning and tree-based ensemble model for anticancer ligand prediction.

Arvind Kumar Yadav, Jun-Mo Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arvind Kumar YadavFunctional Genomics & Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, 17546, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Jun-Mo KimFunctional Genomics & Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, 17546, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. junmokim@cau.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6934-398X

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2018-NR031061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several small molecules have been approved for cancer treatment, but the continuously growing cancer cases have further encouraged the identification of new anticancer drug compounds. Experimental methods are costly and time-consuming, thus rapid and cost-effective alternative method is much required. The effective identification of anticancer compounds using machine learning (ML) offers a promising solution, reducing both time and cost. In this study, small molecules with known inhibitory activities, both anticancer and non-anticancer were considered to train classification models. Molecular descriptors were calculated, and multistep feature selection was applied to identify significant features. Multiple ML algorithms were employed to build classification models and evaluated their performance using independent test and external datasets. The tree-based ensemble model, particularly Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), achieved the highest prediction accuracy of 90.33%, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 97.31%. Consequently, LGBM model was implemented in our proposed method, ACLPred. The ACLPred demonstrated superior prediction accuracy with good generalizability compared to existing methods. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis provided model interpretability and revealed that topological features made major contributions to decision-making. ACLPred is available as an open-source, user-friendly graphical interface at https://github.com/ArvindYadav7/ACLPred for the screening of potential anticancer compounds.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsMachine LearningAlgorithmsHumansLigandsNeoplasmsROC CurveAntineoplastic AgentsLigandsAnticancer ligandCancerEnsemble machine learningMultistep feature selection

Identifiers

PMID40855112
PMCPMC12378186

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.