Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40855270›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Association of antidepressant use during pregnancy and pregnancy-induced hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shuai Hu, Ting Lin, Linqi Li, Jiefeng Liu, Feijun Zhao, Hebin Xie

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Placental Pathophysiology and Developmental Programming of Adult Cardiometabolic Risk: A Narrative Review of Pregnancy Exposures.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shuai Hu *School of Public Health, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China.
Ting Lin *School of Public Health, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China.
Linqi LiThe Affiliated Changsha Central Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Jiefeng LiuFutian Customs, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Feijun ZhaoThe Affiliated Changsha Central Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Changsha, Hunan, China. nhdxzfj@163.com.
Hebin XieThe Affiliated Changsha Central Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Changsha, Hunan, China. 2018050642@usc.edu.cn.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province No. 2020JJ8044the Changsha Municipal Health Committee No. KJ-B2023032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe association between antenatal antidepressant use and pregnancy-induced hypertension (GH/PE) remains controversial, with conflicting evidence on whether depression itself confounds this risk.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure electronic databases from inception to Dec. 31, 2024. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies are randomized trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies exploring the association between antidepressant use during pregnancy and pregnancy-induced hypertension. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed quality. Outcomes were expressed as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

resultsSeventeen observational studies were analyzed, indicating a potential link between antidepressant use in pregnancy and an elevated risk of gestational hypertension/preeclampsia (GH/PE). Pooled odds ratios (ORs) stratified by drug class demonstrated significant associations for: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (OR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.14-1.58); Serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (OR = 1.94; 95% CI: 1.40-2.70); Tricyclic antidepressants (OR = 2.00; 95% CI: 1.32-3.04). Following adjustment for depression as a confounding variable, sensitivity analysis indicated: SNRIs maintained significant association with GH/PE (adjusted OR = 1.53; 95% CI: 1.25-1.88); SSRIs showed no significant risk (adjusted OR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.97-1.10); TCAs lost statistical significance (adjusted OR = 1.80; 95% CI: 0.86-3.74). Subgroup analyses suggesting geographical variations in effect magnitude.

conclusionThis study demonstrates differential associations between antenatal exposure to three antidepressant classes (SSRIs, SNRIs, TCAs) and gestational hypertension/preeclampsia risk. Enhanced blood pressure monitoring is advised during SNRI therapy, with clinical decisions requiring individualized risk-benefit assessment. Residual confounding constrains causal inference, necessitating prospective studies with standardized depression scales and systematic exposure documentation to resolve methodological limitations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42025640646.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsDepressionHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicFemaleHumansPre-EclampsiaPregnancySelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsAntidepressive AgentsAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsAntidepressantsPregnancy-induced hypertensionSNRIsSSRIsSystematic reviewTCAs

Identifiers

PMID40855270
PMCPMC12376750

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.