ReviewBiomedical engineering online2025
Microdamage in biological hard tissues and its repair mechanisms.
Review in Biomedical engineering online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adhesive bonding to dentin in aging and diabetes: a scoping review of substrate-related changes and bonding outcomes.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Effect of Internal Structural Design on Stress Distribution in 3D-Printed Subperiosteal Implants Under Mechanical Loading.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Nutritional Requirements and Metabolic Homeostasis Regulation of Animals Under Stress Conditions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microdamage often occurs in biological hard tissues which mainly include bone tissue and tooth hard tissue, and it primarily comprises diffuse damage and microcracks. The unique microscopic structures of biological hard tissues directly influence the initiation and progression of microcracks. Mechanical forces, loading methods, macroscopic tissue characteristics, aging-related changes, diseases, and medication factors contribute to the complexity of analysis in studying microdamage of biological hard tissues. A large number of literatures have verified the detection and research methods of microcracks. The mechanisms underlying the absorption and repair of biological hard tissues caused by microdamage are still not completely clear. This article reviews the occurrence and development of various types of microdamage in biological hard tissues from microscopic to macroscopic scales, summarizes research approaches of microdamage, elucidates the mechanisms involved in absorption and repair of microdamage, analyzes existing gaps and controversies in current research findings, and proposes potential directions for future research. The study on microdamage of biological hard tissues is crucial for developing biomimetic materials. Such studies facilitate the prediction, control, prevention, and even restoration of microdamage in these materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.