Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40855493›Full record

ReviewBiomedical engineering online2025

Microdamage in biological hard tissues and its repair mechanisms.

Xiaojun Cao, Shengzhao Xiao, Canao Shen, Yubo Fan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedical engineering online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaojun Cao *Department of Stomatology, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Shengzhao Xiao *Department of Orthodontics, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology; Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200011, China. shengzhaoxiao@shsmu.edu.cn.
Canao ShenDepartment of Orthodontics, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology; Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Yubo FanKey Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100083, China. yubofan@buaa.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 12202274School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University YG2022QN049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microdamage often occurs in biological hard tissues which mainly include bone tissue and tooth hard tissue, and it primarily comprises diffuse damage and microcracks. The unique microscopic structures of biological hard tissues directly influence the initiation and progression of microcracks. Mechanical forces, loading methods, macroscopic tissue characteristics, aging-related changes, diseases, and medication factors contribute to the complexity of analysis in studying microdamage of biological hard tissues. A large number of literatures have verified the detection and research methods of microcracks. The mechanisms underlying the absorption and repair of biological hard tissues caused by microdamage are still not completely clear. This article reviews the occurrence and development of various types of microdamage in biological hard tissues from microscopic to macroscopic scales, summarizes research approaches of microdamage, elucidates the mechanisms involved in absorption and repair of microdamage, analyzes existing gaps and controversies in current research findings, and proposes potential directions for future research. The study on microdamage of biological hard tissues is crucial for developing biomimetic materials. Such studies facilitate the prediction, control, prevention, and even restoration of microdamage in these materials.

Indexed as

Wound HealingAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBone and BonesHumansStress, MechanicalToothAbsorption and repairing mechanismDetection and research methodDiffuse microdamageMicrocrackMicrodamageMicrostructure

Identifiers

PMID40855493
PMCPMC12376397

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.