ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2025
The role and contribution of experts by experience in building research capacity in adult social care services: findings from the script study.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Social care occupational therapy and learning disabilities: professional perspectives on communication, collaboration and making a difference.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEngaging individuals with lived experience in social care research is crucial for transforming how knowledge is generated and applied in practice. This study explores the involvement and perceptions of experts by experience in the SCRiPT study, which aimed to build research capacity in social care through Research in Practice Teams (RiPTs). These teams included social care professionals and experts by experience who contributed their lived expertise to research design and execution.
methodsA qualitative approach was used to analyse data from semi-structured interviews and focus groups with RiPT members, social care staff, and experts by experience.
resultsDespite the challenges of recruiting experts by experience into social care research, it was found that experts by experience made significant contributions, offering unique perspectives based on their personal experience with health and social care services. Their input improved the relevance of research, helped shape study design, and ensured the research was more applicable to practice. They also brought valuable research experience, with some contributing to data analysis and ethical discussions. Furthermore, their involvement added enthusiasm and energy to the teams, inspiring greater engagement. Efforts to ensure accessibility and inclusivity were made, including clear communication, adjustments for different impairments, and additional support from a user-led organisation. Experts by experience were seen as equal partners, and their involvement led to positive changes in team dynamics and attitudes. Initially, some team members were unsure of the experts' role, but later interviews revealed a shift in perspectives, with many recognising the contributions.
conclusionsThis study underscores the positive impact of involving experts by experience in social care research. It highlights the potential for co-production to enhance research capacity, improve service delivery, and influence future research practices. Findings suggest that a participatory, collaborative approach can lead to meaningful involvement and improved outcomes, reinforcing the need for experts by experience to be recognised as essential, equal contributors in research teams.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.