Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40856425›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2025

Effect of Immunotherapy on Late Elderly Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World Clinical Study.

Shun Kaneko, Yasuhiro Asahina, Miyako Murakawa, Shunsuke Ueyama, Hideki Watanabe, Chiaki Maeyashiki, Akiko Kusano-Kitazume, Ayako Sato, Kozue Uchidate, Taro Watabe and 23 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Shun KanekoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2660-6580
Yasuhiro AsahinaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Miyako MurakawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0468-4409
Shunsuke UeyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan.
Hideki WatanabeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Chiaki MaeyashikiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Akiko Kusano-KitazumeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Ayako SatoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kozue UchidateDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, JA Toride Medical Center, Ibaraki, Japan.
Taro WatabeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ome Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Takehito AsakawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City Minato Red Cross Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Sho WatanabeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Soka Municipal Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Junko FujikiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kashiwa Municipal Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Isamu ShibataDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Disaster Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinya OookaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Showa General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hitoshi KurataDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Metropolitan Ohtsuka Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Mao TsuchiyaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Kyosai Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi FujiiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Metropolitan Hiroo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Keiichi AkahoshiDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Daisuke BanDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kento InadaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Tsubasa NobusawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomohiro MochidaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Keiya WatakabeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Taro ShimizuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Jun TsuchiyaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Masato MiyoshiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Fukiko Kawai-KitahataDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2173-8681
Sayuri NittaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Mina NakagawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Sei KakinumaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryuichi OkamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Ochanomizu Liver Conference Study Group

Funding

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific ResearchJapan Agency for Medical Research and Development
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimThe global aging population includes an increasing number of elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to clarify the real-world outcomes, prognostic factors, and appropriate administration indicators for immunotherapy in elderly HCC patients.

methodsThis retrospective multicenter study analyzed 286 patients with unresectable HCC who received first-line immunotherapy (atezolizumab-bevacizumab or durvalumab-tremelimumab) between November 2020 and January 2024. Patients were categorized into the late elderly (LE; ≥ 75 years, n = 117) and non-late elderly (non-LE; ≤ 74 years, n = 169) groups. Baseline characteristics, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and prognostic factors were evaluated.

resultsThe LE group had significantly poorer performance status, lower albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) scores, lower alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and alanine transaminase levels, higher creatinine levels, and were significantly less likely to receive post-immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment compared with the non-LE group (56.2% vs. 38.4%, p = 0.0038). Median OS and PFS for the LE group were 25.6 and 10.5 months, respectively. The LE group demonstrated a comparable disease control rate (82.0%) and safety profile. The ALBI score was a significant prognostic factor for both groups. Post-ICI treatment significantly improved OS only in the non-LE group, even after propensity score matching for ALBI score and AFP levels.

conclusionsImmunotherapy is effective and well-tolerated in LE patients with unresectable HCC, particularly in those with preserved liver function (mALBI grade 1/2a). Post-ICI treatment significantly benefits non-LE patients, with limited impact on LE patients, highlighting the need for therapeutic strategies based on age and liver function.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, HepatocellularImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyLiver NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedatezolizumabBevacizumabdurvalumabImmune Checkpoint InhibitorstremelimumabALBI scoreatezolizumab plus bevacizumabdurvalumab‐tremelimumabhepatocellular carcinomapost‐ICI treatment

Identifiers

PMID40856425
PMCPMC12378699

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.