Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40858873›Full record

ArticleBioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy2025

Real-World Data Included in Post-authorisation Measures: A Case Study of Approved Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in the European Union between 2013 and 2024.

Diogo Almeida, Diana Mandslay, Peter G M Mol, Bruno Sepodes, Carla Torre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Diogo AlmeidaFaculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Gama Pinto, 1649-003, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5648-2800
Diana MandslayFaculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Gama Pinto, 1649-003, Lisbon, Portugal.
Peter G M MolDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4262-3180
Bruno Sepodes *Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Gama Pinto, 1649-003, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2761-0955
Carla Torre *Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Gama Pinto, 1649-003, Lisbon, Portugal. carla.torre@ff.ulisboa.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5542-9993

Funding

European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Actions European Union's Horizon Europe ResearchEuropean Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Actions Innovation Actions under grant no. 101095479 (More-EUROPA)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) often require long-term monitoring to assess both safety and efficacy post-authorisation due to uncertainties identified during the approval process. This study aims to characterise the use of real-world data (RWD) in post-authorisation measures (PAMs) for ATMPs approved in the European Union.

methodsA systematic extraction of all PAMs from publicly available European Medicines Agency (EMA) regulatory documents for ATMPs approved between January 2013 and December 2024 was performed, followed by the identification of the presence and sources of RWD. Additional databases including the HMA-EMA Catalogue of RWD studies and sources and ClinicalTrials.gov were consulted.

resultsAmongst 25 ATMPs approved by the European Commission over the study period, a total of 118 PAMs were identified, of which 49 (41.5%) involved RWD. Most RWD-PAMs were imposed by the EMA (n = 34; 69.4%), secondary data use was the most referenced data use type (n = 28; 57.1%) and registries were the main source of RWD being mentioned (n = 26; 53.1%). Further, 5 (10.2%) included a comparator group and 13 (32.5%) incorporated patient-reported outcomes.

conclusionsThis study emphasises the instrumental role of RWD in the post-authorisation monitoring of ATMPs in the European Union. PAMs reflect the regulatory flexibility for these products, shifting some efforts to the post-authorisation phase to address benefit-risk gaps. Enhancing the use of RWD in this context could improve evidence generation, minimise uncertainties and support more informed regulatory decisions.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingDatabases, FactualEuropean UnionHumans

Identifiers

PMID40858873
PMCPMC12568911

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.