Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40858877›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

Investigating the potential psychological significance of the alpha parameter in the Lévy flight model of decision making: A reliability analysis approach.

Mehdi Ebrahimi Mehr, Jamal Amani Rad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mehdi Ebrahimi MehrInstitute for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Jamal Amani RadChoice Modelling Centre & Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. j.amanirad@leeds.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study critically examines the cognitive and theoretical foundations of the alpha parameter within the Lévy flight model (LFM), an extension of the diffusion decision model (DDM) that incorporates heavy-tailed noise distributions. The alpha parameter, which modulates the tail of these distributions, is assessed for its test-retest reliability - an essential criterion for its classification as a cognitive style measure. Utilizing data from three previous studies, we observed that alpha demonstrates consistent reliability across tasks and time points, supporting its role as a trait-like characteristic. Our observation regarding the interrelations between LFM parameters showed that although most parameters exhibited weak correlations, reflecting their representation of distinct aspects of data, moderate correlations were observed between alpha and both threshold and non-decision time. Furthermore, investigating practice effects, we observed consistent reductions in non-decision time, threshold, and often alpha across sessions, accompanied by a corresponding increase in drift rate in demanding tasks. Notably, alpha showed a strong relationship with the mean reaction time of error responses, indicating its critical role in explaining fast error responses. Additionally, our examination of the predicted decision-time distribution found that lower alpha values correspond to shorter response times in the first quartile of both correct and error responses, highlighting its impact on capturing the dynamics of fast decision-making. Employing the BayesFlow framework for parameter estimation, we evaluated its precision across varying trial counts. These findings offer insights for future research on LFM and similar models.

Indexed as

Decision MakingModels, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultBayesFlowDecision-makingDiffusion modelLévy flightsResponse timeTest–retest reliability

Identifiers

PMID40858877
PMCPMC12380952

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.