ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of an easy-to-use nomogram for predicting pancreatic malignancy in patients with pancreatic mass.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and validate a practical nomogram for differentiating between benign and malignant pancreatic masses. A total of 494 patients with pancreatic mass lesions, confirmed by histopathology, were enrolled from Wuhan Union Medical College Hospital between January 2020 and May 2022. The participants were randomly divided into development and validation groups in a 7:3 ratio. Using multivariate logistic regression, the nomogram was constructed based on five independent predictors: blood type, CA19-9, IgG4, anorexia, and weight loss. The model's performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and calibration curves. In the development and validation sets, the areas under the ROC curve were 0.932 and 0.957, respectively. The nomogram demonstrated a high net benefit in the clinical decision curve analysis. Based on the model, pancreatic malignancy risk was classified as low (< 4%), moderate (4%-71%), and high (> 71%). This nomogram provides an easy-to-use, efficient tool for the early differentiation of pancreatic malignancies and could be implemented in primary, secondary, and emergency care settings to facilitate the timely referral of patients to higher-level hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.